“It was also unfair to me because it raised matters to which I was never invited to respond,” he said in his application asking the court to set aside the report that has plunged the ruling party into existential crisis.
It was expected in legal circles that Ramaphosa may raise this argument in defence to the report’s assertion that his version of events surrounding the burglary at his Phala Phala game farm in 2020 was “vague and leaves unsettling gaps”.on charges that he breached the law and the Constitution, particularly with regard to the source of the money stolen from his farm, the actual amount that was taken and the efforts that ensued to recover it.
The panel further failed to understand that a potential finding of serious misconduct or a serious breach of the Constitution or the law, as defined by the rules of the National Assembly, is confined to instances where the president acted deliberately and in bad faith. The panel located grounds for a case to answer not only in the narrative former intelligence boss Arthur Fraser told the police when he brought charges against Ramaphosa in relation to the burglary, but in what it termed the evident holes in the president’s version of what happened at his farm.
Ramaphosa, who was last week pulled back from the brink of resigning by his allies, is reliably understood to be loath to subject himself to the long and distracting process of an impeachment inquiry.is not only a legal strategy but also a political one and in that sense it has worked so far.
We already know zondo will favour him ,he already made it clear that he is pro Cyril and yet he is not called compromised
Hebaan
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Phala Phala debate can’t go ahead if Ramaphosa goes to court, whips hearParliament’s legal advisers have warned that Tuesday’s debate on the section 89 panel report into the Phala Phala saga may have to be postponed if President Cyril Ramaphosa takes the report on review. Just an opinion Ramaphosa must just resign finish and klaar
Source: SowetanLIVE - 🏆 13. / 63 Read more »
Phala Phala debate can’t go ahead if Ramaphosa goes to court, whips hearParliament’s legal advisers have warned that Tuesday’s debate on the section 89 panel report into the Phala Phala saga may have to be postponed if President Cyril Ramaphosa takes the report on review. NOTHING IS GOING TO HAPPEN! The respondent of such action will still be Parliament, does that mean Parliament is going to argue the report in court with Ramaphosa? Parliament legal team are looking into their favorite side of the story If he is not sealing he is postponing ya noor.
Source: TimesLIVE - 🏆 28. / 59 Read more »
Phala Phala debate can’t go ahead if Ramaphosa goes to court, whips hearA special chief whips’ forum was advised that if Ramaphosa goes to court to challenge the report, the matter will be sub judice and may not be discussed or adopted by the house Cyril is a criminal and only code of decency will expose him, there are no decent people in the ANC, they all have skeletons under their beds and ANC ancestors will expose them one by one, they are not sleeping
Source: BDliveSA - 🏆 12. / 63 Read more »