The U.S. Supreme Court went after reproductive autonomy in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, and based on recent oral arguments affirmative action could be next on the chopping block. But there's another landmark case being heard this month that also deserves our attention for its potential to not only roll back anti-discrimination protections for millions of LGBTQ+ Americans but also gut civil rights laws nationwide.
On Dec. 5, the court will hear oral arguments in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis to decide whether a Colorado web designer, Lorie Smith, has a free speech right to refuse to make websites for same-sex couples and post a"straights only" policy on her website. If that sounds familiar, it's because five years ago, the court heard Masterpiece Cakeshop v.
It is not an overstatement to say that 303 Creative has the potential to snowball into one of the most sweeping rollbacks of fundamental civil rights protections in American history. If the Supreme Court accepts Smith's arguments, it will essentially greenlight discrimination against entire groups of people that a business owner may find objectionable and prevent the government from intervening.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Second Superior Court judge announces run for Pa. Supreme Court seatA second Pa. Superior Court judge has announced that she will seek the vacant state Supreme Court seat in 2023, brining the total number of candidates to three so far.
Source: PennLive - 🏆 463. / 53 Read more »
DOJ warns Supreme Court immigration case could allow states to sue over 'virtually any policy'Justices on the Supreme Court appeared concerned Tuesday about the prospect of allowing states to sue the Biden administration over one of its immigration policies, and the Justice Department warned doing so could allow states to 'sue the federal government about virtually any policy.' Maybe that would be a good thing. Especially when the federal government exceeds its tenth amendment limitations. Good. The people have the right to curtail government. Especially at the bureaucratic level not subject to direct election. I’d be OK with that
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Capital gains tax gets the go ahead as state Supreme Court considers caseThe DOR will be able to collect Washington state's new capital gains tax ahead of the Washington state Supreme Court's final ruling on the constitutionality of the income tax. I am sure they will refund the taxes with interest if ruled against. Take it now and worry about being legal later........Bobby. Can someone please take out the AG BF? Um, which, how many Democrat Governors promoted the Taxes for Education as THE FINAL TAX4EDU ? Locke. Gregoire. Washington State Lottery. UNIONS are Fronts for the DNC. The teachers are getting paid less than EVER before, but union leaders R FAT CATS. KEEP voting Democrat.
Source: Mynorthwest - 🏆 438. / 53 Read more »