SCOTUS poll: Where Democrats and Republicans stand on race-based college admissions

  • 📰 FoxNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 56 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 26%
  • Publisher: 87%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

A new Marquette Law School poll found 41% of Americans disapprove of a student's race being factored into college admissions. The Supreme Court is hearing cases on that topic.

About 32% of those who are strongly liberal think that colleges should consider an applicant's race when admitting students into the school, and 21% do not think race should be a factor.

Among White respondents, 45% favor and 16% oppose a potential SCOTUS decision against race-based admissions. About 37% of Hispanics favor a ban on race-based admissions, and 13% oppose the possible rule, while 27% of Black respondents favor a ban on race-based admissions, and 21% believeMembers of the Supreme Court have heard oral arguments in two cases regarding discrimination through racial-based college admissions.

Among all respondents, 44% said that they approve of the job the Supreme Court is doing and 56% disapprove. The latest polling data reveals a positive increase in support forfrom a September Marquette poll that found 40% of adults approved and 60% disapproved of the job the justices are doing. The Marquette Law School poll was conducted from Nov. 15-22 with a margin of error of plus or minus 3.7 percentage points.recently heard two cases from Students for Fair Admissions , alleging Harvard University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill are illegally using race to determine applicant qualification and discriminating against Asian American students.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Admit on merit. I don’t care what color the pilot of my plane is. I do care if they are qualified.

Fighting racism with more racism is not a good strategy, dems

Isn’t that already illegal in the first place, you’re not allowed to hire someone based solely on their race or sexuality.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 9. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Calls for SCOTUS Ethics Probe Grow as Court Lawyer Defends Alito'Supreme Court justices have avoided accountability for too long. It's time for our elected officials to do their job, and serve as a true check on the judiciary.' Those six clown justices need more than just a 'true check.' In their religious partisanship they are traitors to the American people. It was time in 2020 when Democrats had both the presidency and Congress. Now it's too late.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »

SCOTUS immigration case gets heated as conservatives, Jackson swipe at Biden DOJWASHINGTON — Supreme Court oral arguments in a key immigration case grew heated Tuesday as Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson — President Biden’s first nominee to the high court — appeared to reje… One on the right, is clearly a middle or south asian , deport Biden is destroying American values and Western values Wake up America If the immigrants took showers when they got to the us I’m sure Biden would care
Source: nypost - 🏆 91. / 67 Read more »

Same-sex marriage bill passes U.S. Senate as Cruz, Cornyn dissentTexas Republicans argued the legislation would 'trample' religious liberty to protect a... Yey and all but still women rights are less important! When is roe going to be codified? That's not Love that's plain abomination. God did not make man for man or any variation you non believers want. All you did cripple the minds of many by following Satan.
Source: HoustonChron - 🏆 609. / 51 Read more »