, are tough for prosecutors to prove. They frame evaluations of the use of force entirely from the perspective of the officer and their subjective perception of danger. The end result privileges officers over victims and makes it easier for the government to sidestep responsibility.Thousands of desperate migrants have died trying to cross the militarized U.S. border, but U.S. administrations refuse to change border strategies that drive these deaths.
This approach would impose a higher standard to justify the use of force and would respect international norms that the U.S. has accepted, including theand Duties of Man, which was violated when Hernández-Rojas was killed without cause or justification. A ruling against the U.S. would publicly declare it out of compliance with human rights standards, highlight the shortcomings of its use of force policy and establish a precedent for future cases. The hearings have already accomplished a meaningful achievement: For the first time, Hernández-Rojas’ family appeared before a legal body and was allowed to explain how his death affected them. U.S.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »