Supreme Court rejects claim that Alito leaked 2014 opinion on Burwell v Hobby Lobby

  • 📰 FoxNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 24 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 13%
  • Publisher: 87%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court this week rejected claims that Justice Alito leaked a court opinion in 2014 on whether a contraception mandate violated companies' religious freedom.

on Monday rejected allegations that Justice Samuel Alito tipped off conservative activists to the outcome of a landmark religious freedom case in 2014 before the opinion was issued by the court.

this month looking for answers after the New York Times reported that conservative activist Robert Schenck claimed Alito previewed the outcome of Torrey also said that Gail Wright, a friend of Schenck's who also supposedly heard the news from Alito first, has denied the claims and said Schenck's account was"patently not true."SUPREME COURT JUSTICE AMY CONEY BARRETT FACES CALLS TO RECUSE HERSELF FROM LGBTQ CASE OVER CHRISTIAN FAITH

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

I could see trump being a very good Supreme Court justice

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 9. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court counsel defends Justice Alito after he denied allegation of 2014 leakThe U.S. Supreme Court's top legal adviser is defending Justice Samuel Alito after top Democrats on the Senate and House Judiciary Committees had publicly raised concerns about Alito's alleged ethics lapses, which Alito strongly denied. Detesting white people, the City of Seattle began paying their non-white partners that they contract with generous wages in order to advance 'transformative justice' and as a rebuke towards capitalism, which they label a system of white supremacy. Kangaroo Court. lollllll
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

The Supreme Court Stonewalls In Defense Of Samuel AlitoThe court acted as defense counsel in response to threats of congressional inquiries into its ethical lapses. These SCOTUS super-righties are by no measure inherently good people, they only seek to impress their empowered status upon all of the rest of us. Impacting us harshly is the goal. This court under Chief Justices corrupt cesspool . Robert’s is Nothing supreme about these fake corrupt judges
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court defends Alito over report of second leakThe U.S. Supreme Court's legal counsel on Monday defended Justice Samuel Alito after two Democratic lawmakers demanded answers about a former anti-abortion leader's claim that he was told in advance about the outcome of a major 2014 ruling the conservative jurist wrote in a case concerning contraceptives. 🤡 Alito must be forced to step down. Obviously,he's making no attempt to be honest + forthcoming + empathetic to the American People. He's running his position in SCOTUS like a out-of-control organized crime syndicate. SCOTUSblog USSupremeCourt TheJusticeDept congressdotgov I'll take 'things that surprise nobody' for 500
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Lawyer for Supreme Court defends Justice Samuel Alito after allegations of a second leakA lawyer for the Supreme Court said that there is no evidence that Justice Samuel Alito leaked the outcome of a major Supreme Court case involving contraceptives ahead of the 2014 ruling.
Source: nypost - 🏆 91. / 67 Read more »

Supreme Court’s Lawyer Dismisses Ethics Allegations Against Justice Samuel AlitoThe high court’s legal counsel said there isn’t evidence supporting reports that the justice may have been involved in the leak of a 2014 ruling on contraceptive access. “We’ve investigated ourselves and found we did nothing wrong” We didn’t do anything wrong and Alito definitely didn’t leak Dobbs because Alito said he didn’t. Do I have this right? Why do we still not know who leaked the Dobbs decision
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court Weighs Limits in Fraud ProsecutionsThe Supreme Court heard arguments Monday in a set of public-corruption cases that shook up New York politics, with the justices mulling whether to limit how federal prosecutors can pursue fraud cases nationwide Follow the ziti. Federal prosecutors job IS to pursue those. Hmmm wonder who this benefits?🤣🤷🏻‍♂️🖕🏻😂
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »