Supreme Court of Canada welcomes Michelle O’Bonsawin, 1st Indigenous justice | Globalnews.ca

  • 📰 GlobalNational
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Supreme Court of Canada welcomes Michelle O’Bonsawin, 1st Indigenous justice

O’Bonsawin, who replaced the retiring Michael Moldaver on Sept. 1, is a bilingual Franco-Ontarian and an Abenaki member of the Odanak First Nation. O’Bonsawin says she is a big believer that if a person has a goal, works hard and never gives up, they can achieve their dreams.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 81. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

U.S. Supreme Court to weigh Cuomo-era New York corruption casesThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday will consider a pair of cases that could make it harder to pursue public corruption prosecutions – bids by an ex\u002Daide to… Is Fredo ChrisCuomo gonna cover for him again Why hasn't the USA's worst mass murderer, Andrew Cuomo, been brought to justice and made to answer for his heinous crimes?
Source: OttawaCitizen - 🏆 21. / 68 Read more »

Can we stop with the Indigenous identity fraud?The cold, calculated and alarmingly high rates of Indigenous identity fraud are critical problems that need to be addressed through legal channels. While the headline-grabbing instances are raising awareness of this problem, we are not doing enough to discuss and then meaningfully respond to the effects of these acts on dispossessing body, mind, and spirit of Indigenous esquiwak (women). This unilateral extractive relationship, imposed by pretendians, is predetermined, focused, and malicious. It goes against the seven sacred teachings. The unspoken impacts to which I refer are the resulting violation and disenfranchisement, once again, of Indigenous peoples, and particularly Indigenous esquiwak. Once again Indigenous esquiwak are left unsafe, violated, and under threat by patriarchal institutions. Do these actions violate the legal and equality rights guaranteed to us under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms? I, like many, was shocked and disappointed following the news that Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond, previously a well-regarded activist, was not who she purported to be. Yet by not taking ownership of her deliberate misrepresentation spanning numerous decades, she left credible, professional, strong, and intelligent matriarchs to challenge the very problem she herself created. These women have worked tirelessly to rise above oppression to lessen the colonialism that has sought to define us. It is incomprehensible that they now also have to combat the lateral and gender violence of colonialism that is birthed from the actions of women like Turpel-Lafond, women who have successfully co-opted Indigenous lived experience by taking prominent space in the fabric of our society—space that is not theirs to occupy. Through her silence, Turpel-Lafond has pitted Indigenous women against the colonial patriarchal systems that exist within Canada’s various institutions. These very institutions are part of the problem as they condone the passive act of self-declaring Indigeneity, be So long as there is material benefit, people will continue claiming it Is that Sean Atleo next to MELT? My acronym not yours:)
Source: TheHillTimes - 🏆 11. / 79 Read more »

What to do with pretendiansOTTAWA—I found it easier to doubt Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond for her apparent misrepresentation of academic achievements than question her claims of Indigenous identity and belonging.   Her case has brought complex questions about Indigeneity again to the fore after a CBC investigation documented issues with her claims of Cree ancestry and detailed instances where she reported educational accomplishments there was no evidence she had achieved.  Thanks to the federal government and the white supremacy built into the Indian Act, the irony is that Indigenous identity was meant to define who was a “real Indian.” Except that made a total mess of it.  First Nations’ knowledge systems are built on connections between communities and between us, with responsibilities to each other. If a so-called Indigenous community refuses its responsibilities to Indigenous neighbours, that’s the sign it’s not an Indigenous community. Ovide Mercredi was right, as usual, when he called for First Nations to return to our tribes and to ignore the federal government-enforced construct of 631 separate First Nations. When I introduce myself as Taku River Tlingit, my tribe is the 39,000 Tlingit across northwest North America. But I have to claim just one community according to the federal government, which messes up the connections between Tlingit communities. Even worse, the federal government demands status cards as proof of being a “real Indian.” It’s galling in light of the status card history of crossing off First Nations women for arbitrary reasons. The use of status cards to define First Nations individuals breaks the Supreme Court’s 2016 Daniels decision, which ruled that the line between status and non-status is so blurry it cannot be used to exclude individuals. The continued use of status cards upholds the federal government’s power and ironically messes up our knowledge systems, including roles, responsibilities, and belonging. Belonging is essential for mental wellness. It risks exclu
Source: TheHillTimes - 🏆 11. / 79 Read more »