Today the Supreme Court ruled a second independence referendum cannot be held without the green light from the UK Government.
Nicola Sturgeon said: "While disappointed by it I respect ruling of @UKSupremeCourt - it doesn't make law, only interprets it. Another agreed: "Absolutely not the right time to be dealing with this. Scotland's leaders need to concentrate on getting Scotland through this cost of living crisis and staying connected to ensure we all get through it alive."
A number of politicians from a variety of parties are calling for the hot topic of Scottish Independence to be put to bed.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
What will the Supreme Court decision mean for indyref2?Judges will rule on Wednesday morning whether the Scottish Parliament has the power to hold an independence referendum. The present Scottish parilament is not the Scottish parilament of old, that merged with the English parilament in 1707. This is golden opportunity for Britain to show the world how much they respect independence. Britain must not miss this opportunity. What part of 'Once in a generation' do these people not comprehend? FFS move on!
Source: BBCNews - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »
Indyref2: Why is the Supreme Court ruling on a Scottish independence referendum and what could happen?Nicola Sturgeon is pushing for a second independence referendum but the UK government will not give Scotland the authority to hold a vote, so it is now down to Supreme Court justices. Mc Cranky is obsessed! Can we have a second vote of brexit
Source: SkyNews - 🏆 35. / 67 Read more »
Everything you need to know as Supreme Court set to deliver indyref2 verdictNicola Sturgeon instructed the Lord Advocate, Scotland's highest legal officer, to refer the case to the court in London in an attempt to break the constitutional log-jam.
Source: Daily_Record - 🏆 9. / 89 Read more »
Supreme Court to deliver judgment in indyref2 caseThe UK’s highest court is set to deliver its judgment on whether the Scottish Parliament can legislate for a second independence referendum.
Source: Glasgow_Times - 🏆 76. / 59 Read more »
IndyRef2: Second Scottish independence referendum needs Westminster's approval, Supreme Court rulesScotland cannot hold a second independence referendum without first getting the approval of the UK government, Supreme Court judges have ruled. Is a union really a union if one member forces others to stay? This is genuinely comparable to the EU refusing us to hold a referendum in 2016. THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN UPROAR. If countries are held in a ‘Union’ against their will, that union is treading on very thin ice. Let's see all the complaints now 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️ Great 👍🏼
Source: SkyNews - 🏆 35. / 67 Read more »
Supreme Court rules against Scottish Government in IndyRef2 caseJudges in London have issued a 'unanimous' decision against the Scottish Government plan for a second referendum. 'In a huge blow to Scotland'. I fixed that for you. It is the Scottish people who won't get to choose their own future. Scotland is a colony if it can't determine its own future. British extremism has killed the so called “union” Its colonialism and the brainwashed British nationalist extremists in Scotland love it At least they know that their £80 billion oil and gas money over the next 6 years will be going to Westminster who laugh at these clowns I was born in the United Kingdom, my parents, grand parents and great grand parents the same. This is my country. Some fought and died for it,. Happy to remain a proud Scot within UK.
Source: Daily_Record - 🏆 9. / 89 Read more »