Op-Ed: When a Berkeley Law debate on free speech got turned into a social media circus

  • 📰 latimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 69 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 31%
  • Publisher: 82%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Op-Ed: When a Berkeley Law debate on free speech got turned into a social media circus (via latimesopinion)

The great complexity of free speech issues on campus was revealed this semester at Berkeley Law. How are the free speech rights of a student group to not invite speakers with particular views to be balanced against the desire to have all viewpoints expressed and have no one feel excluded?

There was a brief flurry of media attention, but the issue quickly faded. Within the law school conversations continued about how best to balance free speech rights with maintaining a culture of mutual respect and diversity of opinion.“Berkeley Develops Jewish-Free Zones.” Of course, student groups can decide what speakers to include based on their views. Obviously, a college Republicans’ group could decide only to invite conservative speakers. To require student groups to invite speakers of views they loathe would violate the 1st Amendment as a form of compelled speech.

This is not to deny that the effect of the bylaw, if it were followed, would be to exclude many Jewish speakers and would make Jewish students uncomfortable being part of some groups. That is why I condemned it. I wish student groups would not adopt such policies, but a public university cannot prohibit them.

What started as an internal matter, where we were deepening the conversation among our students, faculty and staff about an enormously difficult issue and about how best to support one another, now requires our campus public safety professionals to monitor threats and provide security support for our targeted students. Not only has the marketplace of ideas failed to generate accurate discussions of our situation, it has created a truly dangerous environment.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

opinion The author is so quick to want to break bread with the very people that hate him and his entire religion/ethnicity.

opinion Free Speech has been misinterpreted by certain groups, and excluding speakers seems to be a violation of First Amendment Rights.

opinion No easy path? Free speech is the only path. It’s not difficult.

opinion A

opinion

opinion

opinion Free speech* * 'It's ok when we do it but not them!'

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 11. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

UC Berkeley joins Harvard, Yale law schools by quitting US News rankings over equity concernsThe University of California, Berkeley’s law school on Thursday joined the law programs at Harvard and Yale in pulling out of U.S. News & World Report’s rankings over concerns that they punish efforts to attract students from a broad range of backgrounds.
Source: KTVU - 🏆 465. / 53 Read more »

Georgetown Law Joins Roster of Schools Withdrawing From U.S. News & World Report Law School RankingsGeorgetown University Law Center said that it will no longer participate in the U.S. News & World Report law-school ranking, the latest in a string of prestigious programs abandoning the influential list Don’t fall for their rationale
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

US News will still rank law schools as Georgetown and Columbia join boycottAt least five leading law schools broke up this week with the U.S. News & World Report rankings, with Columbia Law and Georgetown Law on Friday joining the law schools at Yale, Harvard and Berkeley in ending their participation.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »