Closing arguments begin in Oath Keepers trial

  • 📰 YahooNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 70 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 31%
  • Publisher: 59%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

In closing arguments, prosecutors argued that Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes and four of his subordinates had made the historic decision to oppose the peaceful transfer of power from Donald Trump to Joe Biden on Jan. 6, 2021.

Washington — In closing arguments Friday, prosecutors argued that Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes and four of his subordinates had made the historic decision to oppose the peaceful transfer of power from Donald Trump to Joe Biden on Jan. 6, 2021, using "any means necessary," attempting to upend centuries of lawful presidential transitions.

The alleged conspiracy, she argued, was born of the defendants' "sense of entitlement that led to frustration, followed by rage and then violence." In a closing argument on Rhodes' behalf, defense attorney James Lee Bright said the government had not shown evidence of a "meeting of the minds" among the defendants in which they discussed overthrowing the government and storming the Capitol.Rakoczy told the jury the far-right group, charged with seditious conspiracy, was using the Capitol riot to further its mission to oppose the government.

Rakoczy argued on Friday his assertions were "patently absurd, telling the jury, "This wasn't rhetoric. This wasn't ranting and raving. This was deadly serious." The defendants, she argued, committed the alleged crimes, "in favor of force, violence, and an unyielding desire to have the election go their way," an effort that she said continued even beyond Jan. 6.

Bright said the Justice Department had not met its burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt "the big three" crimes alleged: "No plan to storm the Capitol…No plan to breach the rotunda...No plan to stop the certification of the electors," he argued."You get to choose which way you look at it," he urged the jurors, but "lives are at stake. Human lives."

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 380. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

U.S. Urges Jury to Convict Oath Keepers as Jan. 6 Sedition Trial Nears EndFederal prosecutors urged jurors to convict members of the Oath Keepers militia for plotting to violently overthrow the U.S. government, as the first sedition trial stemming from last year's Capitol riot nears an end Convict the foot soldiers, then the suits. Trump will have fun running for potus from house arrest lol It's a DC jury. Rigged from top to bottom. They will be found guilty. the swamp will protect itself by any means neccessary
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Prosecutors and defense rest in Oath Keepers trial | CNN PoliticsGovernment prosecutors and defense attorneys on Thursday announced they have finished presenting evidence in the Oath Keepers seditious conspiracy trial, wrapping up a seven-week effort to argue whether five alleged members of far-right militia plotted to stop Joe Biden from assuming the presidency. Zero. Lock them up!!! In his Manhattan Supreme Court testimony, Weisselberg, 75, denied he conspired with Donald Trump or his family to hide more than a decade worth of company-paid benefits from the CFO’s taxable income
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

Food For Thought: Jan. 6 Rioter Cites A 'Steady' InfoWars Diet Pre-AttackMilitary veteran Jessica Watkins is on trial with four other Oath Keepers for seditious conspiracy. Can’t imagine purposely making my diet 100% feces. If you do, you’re already broken. She was all in. Political prisoners. Putin cheering.
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »