Supreme Court Considers Dismantling Native Sovereignty in Haaland v. Brackeen

  • 📰 truthout
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 82 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 36%
  • Publisher: 68%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court is deciding whether to overturn four decades of legal precedent on Indigenous rights.

Despite being the “gold standard” of child welfare, ICWA has faced more legal challenges than the Affordable Care Act. The Supreme Court consolidated four other ICWA-related cases for briefing and oral argument intoNative families are the most likely to have children removed from their homes as a first resort, and the least likely to be offered family support interventions to keep their child.

Three states — Louisiana, Texas and Indiana — and seven individuals have challenged ICWA, claiming that it creates an illegal race-based federal child-custody system that states are required to implement for all Native children, even those that don’t reside on reservations. Texas argued in the court that they “suffer a classic pocket book injury” in implementing ICWA. Justice Elena Kagan stated during Texas argument that “this is a matter for Congress, not the courts.

At the center of this case are Chad and Jennifer Brackeen, a wealthy white, Christian couple who returned their first foster child because the child was too “difficult.” They then fostered a Native child, knowing they couldn’t adopt the child because of ICWA. They fostered anyway, as, “I thought a baby for 3 months would be a nice way to get our feet wet again.”

The Brackeens, who are now also attempting to adopt another ICWA-protected child, decided they wanted to adopt the child, and a court battle soon ensued. With the pro-bono help of legal firm Gibson Dunn, the Brackeens had their case placed in the favorable court of former President George W. Bush appointee, Judge Reed O’Connor, who’s infamous for ruling in alignment with right-wing causes.

, by Cherokee Nation citizen Rebecca Nagle, details how Gibson Dunn cherry picked the right family and court to overturn ICWA, a decision that has nothing to do with the welfare of Native children.is the latest front in a systematic assault on Native sovereignty being waged by Gibson Dunn and other right-wing lawyers to the benefit of their corporate clients.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Land. Oil. Profit. The real objectives that keep corruption and abuse in solid control of the dishonorable scheming perpetrated against natives, until their total elimination.

👀

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 69. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

DOJ urges Supreme Court to allow Congress to access Trump tax returnsThe Justice Department on Thursday urged the Supreme Court to reject former President Trump’s legal arguments for shielding his tax returns from a Democratic-led House committee. We don’t care about Trump’s Tax returns! Investigate Biden and Hunter’s treasonous corrupt foreign business transactions ! Check Biden’s tax returns 😡 Can't unless they allow access to every presidents tax returns . After all many would love to see ALL of Obama and Biden and even Hillary's tax returns including the classified parts . Why? 🤷‍♀️
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court struggles with a case dealing with the rights of Native American TribesIn the court Wednesday, lawyers for the state of Texas and for non-Native adoptive parents told the justices that ICWA violates the Constitution by discriminating based on race
Source: WBUR - 🏆 274. / 63 Read more »

State's Supreme Court seats its first openly lesbian justiceTwo days after voters approved Patricia Guerrero to become California's first Latina Supreme Court chief justice in January, a state panel on Thursday approved Kelli Evans to be the high court's first openly lesbian justice. why do I care that she is openly gay? Does that affect her job performance? Not sure what a person’s sexuality has to do with her being approved for a position. I personally couldn’t care less about her sexual orientation as long as she has shown she is qualified to do the job she is in line for. It shouldn’t matter to others either! Qualifications should be in the headline, it shouldn’t matter who you love, glad we aren’t blocking the best because someone else fears them
Source: KPIXtv - 🏆 443. / 53 Read more »

California installs first lesbian Supreme Court justiceKelli Evans has been an Alameda County Superior Court judge just since last year. She previously was Gov. Newsom's chief deputy legal affairs secretary.
Source: 10News - 🏆 732. / 50 Read more »

Supreme Court Responsible For Shockingly Poor Republican Election ResultsThe most recent rulings of the US Supreme Court were a major factor in the most recent election. Will the justices learn from that?
Source: cleantechnica - 🏆 565. / 51 Read more »