Litigants challenging planning permissions on environmental grounds should not have to pay costs, Supreme Court rules

  • 📰 IrishTimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 35 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 98%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Mr Justice Brian Murray said the Aarhus Convention requires states to measures to ensure that environmental law proceedings are “not prohibitively expensive”

The High Court overturned the permission. It decided the applicants were entitled to a PCO under section 50B of the Planning Development Act, which concerns the entitlement to public participation in planning decisions, for all of the grounds of their challenge, including points that do not relate to environmental issues.

On Thursday, a five-judge Supreme Court allowed Heather Hill’s appeal, finding the effect of section 50B is that all grounds in proceedings challenging the validity of certain development consents benefit from costs protection. The judge said that, if Heather Hill was correct, they would have been entitled to an order in advance of the trial that they could not be found liable for the costs of the respondent or the notice party if they lost their action.

Mr Justice Murray said certain provisions of the Aarhus Convention require contracting states to take the necessary legislative measures to ensure that environmental law proceedings are “not prohibitively expensive”.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

What a result for the nimbys!

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 3. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court refers questions to Europe in case challenging Project Ireland 2040Friends of the Irish Environment’s case was previously rejected by the High Court and Court of Appeal
Source: IrishTimes - 🏆 3. / 98 Read more »

Man due in court after firearm, ammunition foundA man is due in court tomorrow following the discovery of a firearm and ammunition in Dublin in the early hours of the morning. Glasnevin Ave was formerly Ballymun Ave until the residents campaigned to change the name! Glasnevin Ave is not in Finglas, especially when selling their houses. Actually, Glasnevin Ave is not in Finglas at all!
Source: rtenews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »

Murder-accused 'filled with burning anger' - court toldStephen Silver, who denies murdering Detective Garda Colm Horkan in June 2020, was 'filled with a burning anger' towards gardaí and 'chance presented him with an opportunity' to vent that anger when he met and shot the detective, a barrister has told the Central Criminal Court. And it sounds “sane” to be just “burning with anger” to this level against the Gardaí ?
Source: rtenews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »

High Court appoints provisional liquidators to e-bike firmModmo was affected by a serious safety issue that led to the recall of its e-bikes via IrishTimesBiz
Source: IrishTimesBiz - 🏆 6. / 77 Read more »