Abortion rights protected by voters through ballot measures in Michigan, California, Vermont

  • 📰 CP24
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 77 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 34%
  • Publisher: 67%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Voters in battleground Michigan enshrined abortion rights in the state constitution, joining reliably Democratic California and Vermont in taking that step. An anti-abortion measure in Kentucky was too early to call.

The Tuesday ballot measures came months after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and the constitutional right to abortion it guaranteed to women nationwide. The decision in June has led to near-total bans in a dozen states.

“There's a lot of energy for Prop 3 on campus right now, whether you agree with abortion or not,” Roberts said. “I think students want to have the same rights that their parents had when they were younger.” James Miller, 66, of Flint, Michigan, said he thought of his daughters, granddaughters and great-granddaughters when he voted in favor of the measure.Michelle Groesser, of Swartz Creek, Michigan, said she opposes abortion, even though she believes that any ban likely would have some narrow exceptions. “In a perfect world, I personally would want all life preserved,” she said.

Bauer is an abortion opponent who supports some limited exceptions, “but nobody's willing to throw any kind of compromise ... it's either a yes or no vote.” Lawmakers added the proposed amendment to the ballot last year, a move that some thought would drive more conservative voters to the polls. But after the Roe decision, abortion-rights supporters raised nearly $1.5 million to fight it. They were hoping to repeat the surprise outcome this summer in conservative Kansas, where voters overwhelmingly defeated a similar amendment that would have allowed new bans or restrictions.

Stewart is a registered Republican and opposed to abortion, but still voted no on the amendment. “You got to have a little choice there.”The reproductive-rights question in Vermont, came after Legislature passed a law in 2019 guaranteeing reproductive rights, including getting pregnant and having access to birth control.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Dirtbags...MURDER... imagine 500 years from now they will think how awful we are kill our own... and then celebrate...

Really too bad for the babies who get their limbs torn off piece by piece while alive in the womb. It’s like using “the rack” a horrific torture technique of the Middle Ages. But you get to have as much sex as you want without carry a child to term. Yay for disgusting women.

Imagine murdering babies is your biggest election issue.

Abortion rights? WTF Killing a baby up to 9 months is a right? you are insane!

What happy face, huge victory, hugs and kisses, she celebrate that she can kill a baby if she wants

Americans want relief from inflation, they want lower taxes, a pro-business agenda and leaders who fight crime. They don't care about abortion.

If abortion rights is at the top of your list for reason to vote for someone...you got problems.

Embracing another human being while throwing others (helpless ones at that) in the trash bin. What a contradiction.

She could also be hugging her beautiful baby but, you know...

The right to kill children over the economy great choice their

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 30. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Abortion bans, protections awaiting verdicts from U.S. votersAbortion was on the ballot in several U.S. states Tuesday, months after the Supreme Court overturned the right to abortion in a decision that led to near-total bans in a dozen states. Liberals got their blenders ready
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »