The month before wasn’t much different. Eighteen men and four women, including Prelogar, argued eight cases.
Women also serve as the top appellate lawyers for Louisiana and New York and argue regularly before the court. That partially explains why so few Supreme Court advocates are women and minorities. There also are a relatively small number of slots every year at a court that has been hearing around 60 cases a year recently.
BS, still too many milking white & male faces in the group
Because race is all that matters. SMH, seriously how about the arguments and decisions and less fluff.
Do you have any idea what it takes for an attorney to be certified to present to the Supreme Court?
No it isn’t. Most of them are so conservative they make Rush Limbaugh look like a Liberal. There is no diversity on the court
Yep where two out of 5 men are sexual abusers, over 50% rule on Cult law and not the Law. And 1 in 4 women don't feel women should have rights. I think that sums up America nicely.
You guys are unbelievably racist.
Looks are deceiving
Today's U.S. supreme court behaves like a partisan agency of the Republican party.
The AP hates Whites
Just because they don’t align with your woke beliefs
Don’t judge a judge by its cover. SCOTUS views and rulings do not look like those of the American populace
Clarence Uncle Thomas might be black, but he represents about 5% of their views lol. Amy might be a white check, but again, might represent about 30% of white women's views.
Looks. But isn't.
Looks are deceiving.
Who cares what they look like? What matters is fidelity to the Constitution and the rule of law.
That's why I volunteer with the WBADC - they maintain a list of women SCOTUS litigators (& encourage women to apply for SCOTUS admission & attend our group swearing-in ceremony (note - it's on Nov 14th if you're interested!) RepresentationMatters
Doing opinion pieces now? Wow.
Why hasn’t Clarence been expelled yet
They may LOOK like America, but they don't VOTE like America.
Looks like the Associated Press is trying to get canceled for antisemitism
I find it interesting that no one pointed out the obvious elephant n the Room, back during the Roe Vs Wade Supreme Court leak. It was right after that Socialist Supreme Court Ketanji Brown Jackson was confirmed. 🤫🤫🤫🤫
Best person should get the job regardless of race, Creed, gender. This isn't an inclusion meeting, it's the court.
The court is a partisan joke. Full stop
Our current Supreme Court is a dumpster fire.
Those look like judges, America looks like:
How can 7 of 9 Catholic Justices be representative of a Protestant-majority country? Remember Northern Ireland?
Lol.
Yeah - except it's all appearance, because behind the surface, six of those nine...
You can’t force me to choose a professional anything based on color!
This is dumb comparison. Diverse in appearance, yes; diverse in ideology, no.
Not funny.
None of them are obese demisexual fur babies with a made up disability, though
Lol
What’s diverse about a group of 9 that contains 6 treasonous white supremacists? Seems pretty hegemonic to me.
I won’t be happy until every lawyer is a gay person of color!
Looks ain’t everything.
I dont see a single Starbucks in this photo.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: WOKVNews - 🏆 247. / 63 Read more »
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Source: NBCDFW - 🏆 288. / 63 Read more »
Source: DispatchAlerts - 🏆 72. / 68 Read more »
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »