Judicial activism has been the lefties favorite tool for Social Change for the last 50 years. One minuscule dose of their own activism and a freakathon breaks out at WaPo.
This is hilarious. When the mob went after bakers , it was not. WaPo is a disgrace. The law is unconstitutional period.
But democrats planned for huge obamacare costs to force single payer
What nonsense.
It my hope for 20million man march across America Stop playing with health care
It’s NOT the law of the land
Commie plans land a hard legal wooden stake ...
bwilcoxwrites I thought JUDGES were supposed to be totally NON PARTISAN!!!! APPARENTLY nobody told the right wing nutjob judges the way it's supposed to be!!! How can we even EXPECT them to he fair? WE CAN'T. TRUMP WORLD SUCKS!!!!!!!!
It is appropriate that a Texas judge tried to strike down the ACA. I live in Texas which has the highest % of health uninsured in the nation including children. The judge simply wants the whole USA to be like Texas.
Regarding judicial activism, both by your past silence and past praises regarding judicial activists that have issued rulings favoring Dems policies, it is hypocritical to now act indignant. Set the same standards and be consistent in criticism.
HAHA!!! This... THIS is judicial activism?! The hypocrisy is alive and well at the NYT...
The joke is now on the WP and the extreme left. I told you so but you thought you were smarter.
Judicial activism? You mean like the 9th Circuit?
So let's go for Medicare For All, forget ACA.
Wrong; it is a judge with sense and who knows what is unconstitutional!
I thought liberals did that tho
Weren't you guys just months ago declaring the federal judges were nonpartisan? Remember when Trump said something about Obama judges and y'all lost your shit?
It’s been unconstitutional from the start!
nothing is impossible in the ratpublican bubble lies richfolksonly
That’s Texas for ya.
Nice job repubs!!!!
Most 1-L students can punch multiple holes in this fed district court horse shit.
Obamacare forces the middle class to now use clinics... No more personal doctors... And more expensive to boot... Great job idiots!
Checked and balanced... The way our govt is supposed to work... This whole obamacare fiasco is unAmerican and those who don't plainly see that don't know what America is about... America is where you EARN YOUR BENEFITS, not force others to pay for them... U want socialism GO!!!
This is Rich!!!!
9thcircuit
Just why is it that when a judge rules your way - it's a brilliant ruling. If it rules against you - it's judicial activism? The Republicans have been saying this for years - and now so are the Democrats. I wonder what has changed? 🤔
How do you dims like it huh?
So the Congress needs to craft a healthcare bill that is not unconstitutional and when signed into law will not be overruled in court. What is stopping them?
How ironic that you consider this to be judicial activism yet remain silent on ridiculous rulings regarding immigration and a host of other issues. This delusional opinion is pure crap.
Oh, now we don't love activist judges!
Hmmmm If only there was some Federal legislative branch that could impeach him....
when SCOTUS first ruled onthe ACA, it was Roberts who cast the deciding vote, declaring that it was a tax and not a fine in violating the individual mandate requiring purchase of insurance. when the individual mandate was repealed, the argument used by Roberts is gone. ACA's gone
Investigate and find who paid/donated to the judge.
Lmao....but your fine with the 9th district court's decisions?.....interesting
Wait. The left said judicial activism doesn’t exist...when judges rule in their favor.
What do you call 9th Circuit? Oh, right, that’s your side :)
I don’t recall the Washington post denouncing the travel Ban ruling, or the asylum ruling... But no bias- none at all
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA GOOD ONE! HAHAHAHAHA!!!
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »