to the Supreme Court of Appeal as argued by the Democratic Alliance in their papers.
The advocate claimed that it would be unreasonable for Mkhwebane to remain suspended until such time that the ConCourt rules on the matter.Mkhwebane impeachment: Section 194 inquiry chair ‘avoided laying complaint against Mpofu after threats’ “So the [DA’s] argument really says the Public Protector must be left in her suspended position until some indeterminant date, which might be March or April next year, is just an act of cruelty because all it means is that she must just wait,” Mpofu continued.
Mpofu further insisted that the high court’s order granted on 9 September, which ruled that the Public Protector’s suspension was invalid, was not subject to the ConCourt’s approval.Meanwhile, Ramaphosa’s lawyer, Karrisha Pillay, argued that Mkhwebane’s leave to appeal application was “an abuse of process”.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: TheSAnews - 🏆 25. / 59 Read more »