medications taken to prevent infection with HIV. That means HHS can't require thatplans sold in the U.S. cover PrEP, as it has since 2020, following a recommendation from its medical experts. That rule has now been placed under what may become a permanent injunction.
Why would the plaintiffs want to do this? Because PrEP encourages young men to sodomy, of course! Apparently, allowing people to avoid death from terrible plagues is too big a price to pay for maintaining the anti-sex and especially anti-LGBTQ moral code. So it's a violation of these conservative plaintiffs' sincerely held religious beliefs.cases that trammeled the Affordable Care Act's guarantee of contraception coverage.
What's really under fire is HHS' power to mandate coverage of preventive care treatments that are proven to save lives, including ones that protect against illnesses one can acquire through sex. But that's not a policy fight that's going to be won with the Biden White House, so instead we get religious objections to ...
The defendants argued that since Hotze et al. are making empirical claims – more young men will have sinful boysex if they have access to PrEP – they should have to prove them up to counter the evidence on the other side that led to the rule being enacted.
where are laws protecting sincerely held secular beliefs? Do they not count?
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Federal judge strikes down federal school mask and vaccine mandate for Head Start programU.S. District Court Judge Terry A. Doughty in Louisiana ruled that the federal government cannot push a COVID-19 vaccine or mask mandate for the Head Start program. This mandate should never have happened in the first place.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Americans under felony indictment have a right to buy guns, judge rulesA federal law prohibiting people under felony indictment from buying firearms is unconstitutional, a federal judge in Texas has concluded, citing a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that significantly expanded gun rights. What a country ... Innocent until proven guilty IS A THING. Wtf is wrong with some of you? Indictment does not equal conviction. So if you’re indicted for a felony you don’t lose your rights until you’ve been convicted. People have been indicted but not convicted. This is a good ruling.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Guns for criminals? Texas judge’s gun rights ruling makes us less safeA federal judge in Texas has wrongly ruled that indicted people can purchase and own guns. He gets the law and history wrong. Crazy, we need BetoORourke to win An indictment isn't the same as a conviction. More safe.
Source: dallasnews - 🏆 18. / 71 Read more »
Montana to comply with court order allowing transgender birth certificate changes without surgeryMontana's health department said it will comply with a district court's order that instructed it to allow transgender people to amend their birth certificate without undergoing surgery. As Galileo said to the Inquisition about the Earth... It moves nevertheless. Wow. The sane lost montana? How? What’s next? Can I commit murder and simply change the victims birth certificate to “post-natal aborted”?
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »