Judge grants injunction preventing enforcement of Indiana's abortion restrictions

BLOOMINGTON — A special judge has granted a motion for a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit against Indiana's new abortion law, effectively blocking its enforcement as the case proceeds.

Previously, Hanlon denied a motion for a temporary restraining order filed by the plaintiffs, which includes several Planned Parenthood chapters. The new abortion law went into effect Sept. 15. It prevents women from having an abortion except in instances of rape and incest before 10 weeks post-fertilization or in which the mother's life is threatened.

Seriously? Hoosier's You do NOT WANT GOVERNMENT INFRINGING UPON YOUR REPRODUCTION. PRO or CON! HUMAN CHOICE. LIBERTY! Research History what Governments have LAWED on citizens reproduction. It will make you sick! Give an inch and they will take a mile.

This is fantastic news for the women of Indiana!!!

Agh yes, back to murdering the babies.

Let's hope Indiana can really ramp up the killing while the 'stay' is in effect.

Fantastic! Indiana gets to kill more babies because a judge thinks the elected representatives cant make laws protecting their life.

Women, girls, and ALL Hoosiers win today as bodily autonomy is not 'contingent upon first experiencing extreme sexual violence ... or [risk of] death.' This decision is about LIBERTY. IUMcKinney acsiumckinney ACLUIndiana PPact IUNewsroom

Thank goodness! Abortion is healthcare!

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Saskatchewan Appeal Court removes injunction, allows Broncos lawsuit to proceedIn a decision released Tuesday, the Court of Appeal ruled the judge who granted the temporary injunction made an error.
Source: TheStarPhoenix - 🏆 253. / 63 Read more »

Judge promises to issue ruling in state abortion law challenge 'expeditiously'ACLU's attorney said the new abortion law is 'an illegal restriction of personal rights.' Indiana's Solicitor General argued people aren't guaranteed 'complete sovereignty over their own affairs.' So if I run into a hospital, grab a new born, then kill it. I will be charged with murder. If a woman 2 minutes before the baby is berthed, mom decides to cut it into pieces is not 1st degree murder? Shame on u Indy Dark Star!! If you're going to tell Jews that their religious right to abortion access isn't protected under the dubious non-descriptor of 'religious freedom,' you're blatantly violating the First Amendment. Wtf solicitor general?
Source: indystar - 🏆 434. / 53 Read more »