Mar-a-Lago search: Appeals court rules in DOJ’s favor in request to review documents

  • 📰 ActionNewsJax
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 17 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 10%
  • Publisher: 53%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

BREAKING: A federal appeals court has ruled that the Department of Justice can continue to view documents marked as classified that were taken from former President Donald Trump’s residence

The panel noted that the ruling was a temporary decision, according to the newspaper. Trump’s attorneys can appeal the decision.

The DOJ argued that the ruling by the district court “likely erred in exercising its jurisdiction to enjoin the United States’ use of the classified records in its criminal investigation and to require the United States to submit the marked classified documents to a special master for review,” the panel wrote. “We agree.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Boring!

That dude is F’d. 🤣

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 436. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

11 Republican AGs Press Appeals Court To Back Trump On Mar-A-Lago Special MasterState attorneys general led by Texas' Ken Paxton parroted Trump's claim that the FBI 'ransacked' his home in search of classified documents. These crooks will perish in jail. Ken Paxton has an indictment. I'm voting for Rochelle Garza, his Dem challenger. Scumbags
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »

Trump Urges Appeals Court to Reject DOJ Bid to Review Classified Mar-A-Lago DocumentsThe filing came before attorneys for Trump and the DOJ were set to appear for a conference with the special master reviewing the seized Mar-a-Lago records. Something to hide? I would bet on that!
Source: nbcchicago - 🏆 545. / 51 Read more »

Trump urges appeals court to keep shielding records from Justice DepartmentBREAKING: Donald Trump's lawyers urged an appeals court to keep shielding documents seized at Mar-a-Lago from the Department of Justice. Absolutely. DOJ— most dangerous hate group in America. Then the FBI, then the Democratic Party. Top three hate groups. Ok here comes all the ppl infatuated with trump they are still living in the past. Maybe the DOJ will seize your medical records too and let you walk the streets. If the documents were declassified then the world should see them all
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »

Trump asks appeals court to reject DOJ request to keep reviewing classified Mar-a-Lago docsTrump's legal team argues that the DOJ has not proven that the documents 'it claims are classified are, in fact, classified.' Trump’s lawyers* And it’s as embarrassing as his hair and make up job… Documents doesn’t belong to him
Source: axios - 🏆 302. / 63 Read more »

U.S. urges appeals court to block Trump from reviewing classified recordsFormer President Donald Trump has failed to provide evidence he declassified any records the FBI seized from his Florida estate and he is not entitled to review them or have them returned, the U.S. Justice Department has argued to a federal appeals court. Prosecutors have asked the Atlanta-based appellate court to lift a stay by U.S. District Judge Alieen Cannon that bars them from using any of the classified materials in their ongoing criminal investigation until after an independent arbiter called a special master completes a review to weed out any documents that could be privileged. The government's latest filing came just hours after U.S. Judge Raymond Dearie, who was appointed by Cannon as special master, pressed Trump's attorneys at a hearing in Brooklyn to provide him with evidence that Trump had actually declassified some of the seized materials. Clinton's sock drawer
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Florida appeals to Supreme Court over controversial social media lawThe question of whether states can regulate how social media companies decide what's on their platforms is headed to the Supreme Court. How about Good!
Source: axios - 🏆 302. / 63 Read more »