Congress Eyes Strongest Response Yet to Jan. 6 Attack

  • 📰 snopes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 80 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 35%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The House and Senate bills would better define the vice president’s ministerial role in certifying presidential elections and make clear that he or she has no say in the final outcome. — The Associated Press

Trump and his allies tried to exploit the law’s vague language in the weeks after the election as they strategized how they could keep Joe Biden out of office, including by lobbying Vice President Mike Pence to simply object to the certification of Biden’s victory when Congress counted the votes on Jan. 6.

“We’ve got to make this more straightforward to respect the will of the people,” said Senate Rules Committee Chairman Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., whose committee will hold a vote on the legislation bill next week. “We don’t want to risk Jan. 6 happening again,” she said. While the House vote is expected to fall mostly along party lines, the Senate bill has some Republican support and its backers are hopeful they will have the 10 votes they need to break a filibuster and pass it in the 50-50 Senate. But that could be tricky amid campaigning for the November midterm elections, and Republicans most aligned with Trump are certain to oppose it.

Like the Senate bill, the House legislation would require that there is a single set of electors from each state submitted by the governor. The House bill would also narrow the grounds on which members of Congress could object to any state’s electoral votes and raise the threshold for how many objections would be needed. Currently, the House and Senate each debate and vote on whether to accept a state’s electors if there is just one objection from each chamber.

The general similarities of the House bill to the Senate version could be a signal that House members are willing to compromise to get the legislation passed. Some House members had criticized the Senate bill for not going far enough. Maryland Rep. Jamie Raskin, a member of both the Jan. 6 and House Administration committees, had said this summer that the Senate bill was not “remotely sufficient” to address the challenges presented by current law.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Going from 4 hours of prison time to 7. That will show them.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 228. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Congress eyes strongest response yet to Jan. 6 attackHouse Democrats are voting this week on changes to a 19th century law for certifying presidential elections
Source: WOKVNews - 🏆 247. / 63 Read more »

Congress eyes strongest response yet to Jan. 6 attackHouse Democrats are voting this week on changes to a 19th century law for certifying presidential elections. Will this prevent the Supreme Court from delivering the GOP their promise to turn the Independent State Legislature theory into law? Term limits! We need to stop these old politicians that are disconnected from reality & living wealthy on hard working American’s backs. Corrupt democrats want to change electoral laws so that they can remain in power indefinitely & continue to destroy our country. We need to vote all of them out including the RINOs, we need new blood instead of corrupt career politicians.
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »