RM31m CBT trial: Defence accuses Zahid’s ex-secretary of being biased against ex-boss

  • 📰 malaymail
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 85 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 37%
  • Publisher: 86%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 20 — Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi’s former executive secretary Major Mazlina Mazlan @ Ramly is biased against her former employer and should be seen as...

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 20 — Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi’s former executive secretary Major Mazlina Mazlan @ Ramly is biased against her former employer and should be seen as someone who will not testify truthfully in his trial, his lawyer said today.

Ahmad Zahid’s lead defence lawyer Datuk Hisyam Teh Poh Teik today tried to justify why Fadzlette’s court testimony — which the prosecution says was aimed at attacking Mazlina’s credibility — should be accepted in full by the High Court. Major Mazlina Mazlan @ Ramly is pictured at the Kuala Lumpur High Court August 25, 2020. — Picture by Firdaus Latif

Hisyam argued that Section 153 cannot be used to strike out or to remove the disputed parts of Fadzlette’s testimony, claiming that what Fadzlette had mentioned regarding Mazlina are core issues or main issues related to the criminal breach of trust charges against Ahmad Zahid. Raja Rozela argued that the defence’s sole purpose of introducing Fadzlette as a witness is to tell the court that Mazlina is allegedly not a good person and complains about petty things, but said such matters are collateral matters or not the main issues in the case and should not be accepted by the High Court as evidence.

“What Exception 2 talks about is about circumstances where a witness came to court to say that he is biased, or he was corrupted, or he was forced to give evidence against the other party, and there is none in the evidence before Your Lordship. “The court must not be influenced by the challenge on her character, because Major Mazlina’s credibility has already been challenged in cross-examination. The question has been asked whether the accused gave her instructions, questions had been asked about cheques and she answered. Those questions and answers in cross-examination is sufficient for Your Lordship to make a finding whether or not she is a credible witness, and the buck stops there,” she said.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Semua org lain salah, yg belanja duit rasuah dia

Nk salahkan secretary lol... ko buat apa.? Tido ?

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 1. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Azalina, four Pakatan MPs propose law to give Malaysian women right to pass citizenships to kids born abroadKUALA LUMPUR, Sept 19 — Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said and four Pakatan Harapan (PH) MPs have each submitted a Private Member’s Bills to the Dewan Rakyat, seeking to give... Pls do that..its difficult for mother's like me..we don't know what is ahead us..
Source: malaymail - 🏆 1. / 86 Read more »

Prosecution objects to ‘irrelevant’ testimony of Zahid’s aide about star witness in RM31m CBT trialKUALA LUMPUR, Sept 19 — The High Court should reject parts of testimony from Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi’s press secretary, Maj Gen (Rtd) Datuk Fadzlette Othman Merican Idris...
Source: malaymail - 🏆 1. / 86 Read more »