Piling on, pro-Trump conservative group joins fight against noncitizen voting in New York City

  • 📰 Gothamist
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 50 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 53%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

A NYC law that would allow noncitizens to vote in municipal elections is facing yet another legal challenge—this time in federal court—after an Indiana-based conservative legal group filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court on behalf of four local voters.

, PILF’s leaders have been among a cadre of lawyers who have stoked unfounded fears of election fraud across the country and backed former President Donald Trump’s lies that the 2020 election was stolen. In reply to the press reports, Bowman said in a statement that read in part, “The Public Interest Legal Foundation is a nonprofit, public interest law firm dedicated exclusively to election integrity. Fears of election crimes are not baseless.

Amid a national tug-of-war over voting rights – with legislation and court cases seeking either to expand or curtail voting access and eligibility, largely divided on political lines – the federal lawsuit against Local Law 11 brings a new argument to the courts, according to University of Kentucky law professor Josh Douglas, who studies voting rights and elections law.

The latest complaint cites the 15th Amendment, which granted African American men the right to vote, and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which outlawed literacy tests and other election restrictions barring many Black Southerners from voting. “This particular legislation is going to shift the power dynamics in New York City in a major way,” Cultural Affairs Commissioner Laurie Cumbo – then a councilmember representing parts of Brooklyn – is quoted in the lawsuit as saying. And later on: “I’m clear how the Dominican Republic community will benefit, but not the African American community.”

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 456. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Erika Jayne Scores a Legal Win as Judge Rules She Wasn't Aware of Tom Girardi's Alleged Crimes - E! OnlineA California judge ruled in favor of The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills's Erika Jayne as part of a fraud lawsuit against the reality star and her husband Tom Girardi. She still has the 50M Edelson lawsuit and that's a serious lawsuit. She definitely isn't anywhere near out of the woods yet. She is also fighting hard to keep the stolen earrings. TheEmilyDBaker 1 out of a billion lawsuits ISNT a win
Source: enews - 🏆 466. / 52 Read more »

The $250 Million Guelph Treasure Will Not Be Returned to the Heirs of Jewish Collectors, a U.S. Court Has Ruled | Artnet NewsA district judge ruled the U.S. has no jurisdiction over restitution of the Guelph Treasure at Berlin's Stiftung Preussischer Kulturbesitz.
Source: artnet - 🏆 522. / 51 Read more »

R. Kelly Tells Judge He Won't Testify at Ongoing TrialSinger R. Kelly says he won’t testify in his own defense at his ongoing trial on charges that accuse him of child pornography, enticement of minors for sex and fixing his 2008 trial. Kelly’s judge raised the issue on Thursday minutes before attorneys for Kelly and two co-defendants began calling their first witnesses in hopes of countering two weeks of government testimony. Kelly told the judge he had discussed the matter with his lawyers and had decided not to testify. Taking the witness stand is always risky, including because it subjects a defendant to cross-examination. There’s always a chance a defendant blurts out something incriminating under tough questioning.
Source: NBCLA - 🏆 319. / 59 Read more »