Ginni Thomas pressed Wisconsin lawmakers to overturn Biden’s 2020 victory

. She urged them to set aside Biden’s popular-vote victory and “choose” their own presidential electors, despite the fact that the responsibility for choosing electors rests with voters under Arizona state law.

Ginni Thomas’s political activism is highly unusual for the spouse of a Supreme Court justice, and for years it has raised questions about potential conflicts of interest for her husband. She has said that the two of them keep their professional lives separate.copies of text messages that Ginni Thomas exchanged with Mark Meadows, then President Donald Trump’s White House chief of staff, in the weeks following the 2020 election.

Less than two weeks later, on June 28, Paoletta told the committee that while Thomas remained willing to sit for an interview, he did not believe there was “sufficient basis” for her to do so. Bernier said she had not realized that Thomas was among the thousands of people who emailed her after the election, but she said Thomas “has a First Amendment right to speak her mind.”

The fact that Thomas sent one of the FreeRoots emails to Bernier has not been previously reported. “Please do your Constitutional duty!” read the subject line of the message she sent.

Boy, between being a co-supreme court justice and trying to overthrow the government, that Ginni was one busy traitor!

So? BFD. She's just somebody's wife. Nothing more nothing less.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

PolitiFact - Is Joe Biden’s student debt forgiveness plan legal?It’s unclear whether a lawsuit could be heard on President Biden's administration waiving student debt. But if it does head to court, the plan's legal rationale may not hold up. It seems like you may want to have added the context mentioned in the story of how 'the plan's legal rationale may not hold up' given SCOTUS has recently been striking down all sorts of executive actions based on whimsy If the student loan forgiveness plan did go to court, a majority of Supreme Court justices might rule against the plan based on the court's recent aggressiveness in curtailing federal agencies’ claims of authority. No president has the power to offset personal loans to the masses. It’s just not fair. There has to be a lawsuit for the benefit of our country to reign in politicians scams on the people for personal political gain
Source: PolitiFact - 🏆 17. / 71 Read more »