Zahid’s VLN case: A clear case of selective prosecution, says defence

  • 📰 theSundaily
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 25 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 13%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Hisyam said the prosecution also ailed to act fairly, consequently resulting in Ahmad Zahid’s rights under Articles 5 and 8 of the Federal Constitution being infringed. theSun theSundaily news Malaysia zahid Court

: Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi’s defence team told the High Court here today that the 40 charges of receiving bribes in connection with the Foreign Visa System made against the former deputy prime minister were a clear case of selective prosecution and with no prima facie.

“It is also the prosecution’s version that the accused received political donations with no strings attached ,” he said in his submission at the end of the prosecution’s case. He also said three witnesses, comprising UKSB administrative manager David Tan Siong Sun and two former UKSB directors, namely, Harry Lee Vui Khiun and Wan Quoris Shah Wan Abdul Ghani, who are the 15th, 16th and 17th prosecution witness respectively, are untrustworthy, dishonest with zero credibility.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 25. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines