PolitiFact - U.S Supreme Court is not going to put Trump back in office

Donald Trump can run for president again in 2024. But social media posts suggesting he has been or is about to be reinstated are wrong.

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to take up an election law case pertaining to the powers of state legislatures. A ruling is expected next summer that could affect future elections, but not results from 2020.A TikTok post announcing"Trump return news" suggests that the U.S. Supreme Court will put former President Donald Trump back in office soon — but that’s bogus.

"There is this crazy news happening right now about a possible Trump return whenever the Supreme Court gets back from recess," the speaker says on a"When they come back, they are going to actually take up a case about election law, particularly about the power of the courts versus the legislature in each state."

The speaker in the TikTok video concludes by referencing one of Trump’s posts on Truth Social and says that "the Supreme Court is going put him back into the office of presidency in October." The TikTok distorts some news developments by suggesting they add up to Trump returning to the presidency in October. They don’t. Trump can run for president again in 2024, but the court isn’t going to reinstall Trump. The post is another one of many wrongly suggesting Trump will be or

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

PolitiFact - U.S Supreme Court is not going to put Trump back in officeA TikTok video suggests the Supreme Court will return former President Donald Trump to office as early as October. The court can’t just place him back in the White House. Why even report this? No one took that video serious. Thank you fact checking a random TikTok 🤡 Stop with the CrazyTalk!!
Source: PolitiFact - 🏆 17. / 71 Read more »

Bill Barr lied about considering charging Trump with obstruction of Mueller, court saysRachel Maddow reports on a panel decision by a federal appeals court in Washington that said that contrary to Bill Barr's public announcement that he had evaluated the evidence of obstruction in Robert Mueller's report and decided there was not enough to charge Donald Trump, Barr did not give consideration to such a charge before declaring insufficient evidence. We’re at a crossroads of tyranny and liberty! Mueller had the say. He said not enough to charge. Sadly. Give it up mr Maddow
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »