Government's revised energy policy a 'Pandora's Box': AIG CEO | Sky News Australia

  • 📰 SkyNewsAust
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 78%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Innes Willox: We haven't seen the details of how it would work but these are uncharted waters. It's very murky and we question why it's necessary at all. It had better be a good plan. MORE: Speers

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

No what should be done is all in renewable commitment with the resulting jobs. No more fossil fuels for dollar's. We have 12 years

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 7. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

EXPLAINER: The government 'big stick' energy plan | Sky News AustraliaSky News Political Editor David Speers breaks down the government's 'big stick' divestiture policy.\n\nThe Coalition is hoping its threat to forcibly remove assets from companies deemed to have done the wrong thing will help drive down energy prices.\n\nUnder the new bill the government is planning to introduce to parliament, the Federal Court would have final say over whether an energy retailer should have an asset forcibly stripped if it has been found guilty of misconduct.\n\nThe policy is in place of the National Energy Guarantee, which the Coalition formally dumped after Scott Morrison was elected prime minister.\n\nLabor has called the policy 'Venezuela-esque,' while businesses have also repressed its reservations. David_Speers Its all just waffle. Morrison is not capable nor is Shorten , we are stuck with high power for ever ,get used to it. David_Speers It's yet another form of market intervention by the Lib Gov't. This one may potentially be really ugly and costly (to the taxpayers) as reportedly the big players have lawyered up and are ready to challenge it in courts of law. AntiCompetition auspol
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »