In a 5-4 decision today, the top court says that “no, not without a condom” should not be found to mean “yes, without a condom” in a courtroom.
The court has ordered a new trial in a British Columbia case in which a complainant told a new sexual partner, Ross McKenzie Kirkpatrick, that she would only have sex with him if he wore a condom. The fact Kirkpatrick used a condom the first time they had sex led the complainant to assume that he was already wearing one when he initiated sex for a second time, she told the court – but he wasn’t, which she said she did not realize until he ejaculated.
The sexual assault charge against Kirkpatrick was dismissed by a trial judge who found there was no evidence the complainant had not consented to “the sexual activity in question,” nor that the defendant had been explicitly deceitful, which would have been another avenue for conviction. Although the reasons for its decision are split, the Supreme Court unanimously agreed with the B.C. Court of Appeal’s decision that the trial judge erred in the finding of no evidence.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas cancels plans to teach at GWU law school this fallSupreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has backed out of teaching a seminar at George Washington University's law school in the nation's capital, following student protests and the university's statement of support for the conservative justice's role on campus.
Source: fox5ny - 🏆 587. / 51 Read more »
'Rage giving': Charities can get a boost from current events, such as controversial Supreme Court rulingsWhen anger over everything from the killing of unarmed people of color to new restrictions on access to abortion bubbles over, many Americans act on it.
Source: dothaneagle - 🏆 337. / 59 Read more »
California Supreme Court chief justice won't seek a second termThe California Supreme Court's chief justice said Wednesday that she will not seek a second 12-year term in November and will conclude her term of office January 1.
Source: KPIXtv - 🏆 443. / 53 Read more »
Legal experts say Supreme Court abortion decision has raised myriad ethical, legal dilemmasOne of many complications of the abortion debate is that lawmakers are defining medical terms differently than doctors.
Source: clevelanddotcom - 🏆 301. / 63 Read more »
House Democrats push bill that would term limit Supreme Court justicesA group of House Democrats proposed a bill Tuesday that would place 18-year term limits on Supreme Court justices, just a little over a month after the court reversed Roe v. Wade. Need to push a bill for term limits in Congress first! Great Idea! How about term limits for Congress?
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »