which saw Rooney dubbed ‘Wagatha Christie’. Vardy vehemently denied the claims and sued for libel.
It centred on the now infamous line Rooney used in October 2019 to reveal the account allegedly responsible for the leaks: ‘I have saved and screenshotted all the original stories which clearly show just one person has viewed them.Vardy, 40, vehemently denied leaking stories to the press and sued the fellow footballer’s wife for libel, but Coleen defended the claim arguing that her post was ‘substantially true’.
In a rather genius plot, Rooney revealed that she had been sharing fake stories to her own Instagram stories after suspecting that one of her followers was leaking tales from her private account to the press. The court is told Vardy was not referring to Rooney when she called someone a ‘nasty bitch’ in one exchange with Watt.
April 29, 2022: Rebekah Vardy ‘appears to accept’ that her agent was the source of allegedly leaked stories However, Hugh Tomlinson QC, for Vardy, argued Rooney had ‘failed to produce any evidence’ that Vardy had ‘regularly and frequently abused her status as a trusted follower’ of her private Instagram account by passing on information from it to The Sun.
So, the verdict has landed on the WagathaChristie trial and Rebekah Vardy has lost, but how did it get to this point? Well, luckily Metro_Ents has put together a refresher of all the events that took place👇
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: i newspaper - 🏆 8. / 89 Read more »
Source: GraziaUK - 🏆 15. / 78 Read more »
Source: OK_Magazine - 🏆 12. / 84 Read more »
Source: OK_Magazine - 🏆 12. / 84 Read more »