Jamiu Agoro, counsel to MultiChoice, argued that the tribunal could not hear the suit because by Section 47 of its Act, but could only listen to appeals on matters that had been decided on by the FCCPC.
Agoro argued that if the claimant felt aggrieved by the decision of MultiChoice, he should have approached the FCCPC with his grievance. However, the three-member tribunal headed by Thomas Okosun said there was an order for counsels to the parties to argue on all the applications and the originating summons at Thursday’s hearing.
Consequently, the tribunal said its ruling/decision on the applications taken on Thursday, will be contained in the judgment to be delivered in the case after argument on the originating summons that was adjourned to Monday, July 25, 2022.All rights reserved. This material, and other digital content on this website, may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or in part without prior express written permission from PUNCH.
Hmmmmmmmmm Multichoice is just exploiting Nigerians of the hard earned money with their monthly subscriptions instead of Pay As You Go or Pay Per Views. What they cannot practice in South Africa and other countries should be stopped here in Nigeria by ALL LEGAL MEANS. Shalom
They really need to be cautioned.
Eleyi multi choice be hiking price every 3 months 🤷♂️
Food prices 📈 Petrol prices📈 Flight prices 📈 But DSTV prices is the only thing Nigerians wail about....When DSTV raise prices even members of NASS launch investigations....Shows this country's priorities
Chai! Make we no still see Tv watch again!
🤔bigbrother
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: GuardianNigeria - 🏆 1. / 94 Read more »
Source: GuardianNigeria - 🏆 1. / 94 Read more »
Source: PremiumTimesng - 🏆 3. / 78 Read more »
Source: thecableng - 🏆 2. / 80 Read more »