The lawsuit was dismissed because the states passed the ERA after the 1982 deadline given by Congress. That deadline only applied to the preamble of the ERA, Kelly said.that the ERA is the 28th Amendment.The 24 words that would add gender equality to the Constitution and were ratified by 38 states do not include the deadline.The states shouldn’t have to be beholden to a congressional deadline, Kelly said.
The time for constitutional protections for gender have never been more urgent. “We will not have permanent protections if we are not in the Constitution,” Kelly said. “Losing access to abortion as a fundamental right illustrates the vital importance of changing the Constitution.But for Kelly, who first learned about the ERA when her mother and grandmother were organizing against it in the 1970s at the behest of the Mormon Church, the ERA represents a long game and a systemic solution.
caitlinrcruz This is claim the WashPost Fact Checker awarded 4 Pinocchios' ('Whopper') status, 'simply wrong.' 'Every time the issue has been litigated in federal court...the pro-ERA side has lost, no matter whether the judge was appointed by a Democrat or Republican.'
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: abc13houston - 🏆 255. / 63 Read more »