it’s not unconstitutional for police to stop a person that they “reasonably suspect” to be involved in criminal activity or frisk that person if they believe they’re armed: Police need to have reasonable suspicion that a person is involved in criminal activity.all of this is up to police judgment and during the interaction police don’t have to prove their suspicions or even tell you why you were stopped.
. After the police have stopped you — if they believe that you are armed, then they are legally allowed to frisk you. This is completely up to police judgment — whether the frisk is illegal or not can only be addressed later down the road.. There’s nothing that can be done during the interaction, but there may be legal remedies later.
“90% of the stops or even more — nothing is found that is illegal and the person is just told to go on their way.”If you have a weapon:. Once the officer thinks or knows you have a weapon — Do not reach for it. . They will use their hands to pat your clothing down — and the exterior of your bag if you have one — to check for weapons.In order for police to legally and fully search your belongings they need proof that you are involved in criminal activity. However, if police identify an object that feels like a firearm or illegal substance — they are allowed to go into that pocket or other place to seize those items.
Your rights are: Don’t be doing any illegal shit. Problem solved
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: PhillyInquirer - 🏆 81. / 68 Read more »