House passes same-sex marriage bill in retort to high court

  • 📰 ksatnews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 86 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 38%
  • Publisher: 53%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The House has overwhelmingly approved a bill to protect same-sex and interracial marriages.

Wary of political fallout, GOP leaders did not press their lawmakers to hold the party line against the bill, aides said. In all, 47 Republicans joined Democrats in voting for passage.

While the Respect for Marriage Act easily passed the House with a Democratic majority, it is likely to stall in the evenly split Senate, where most Republicans would probably join a filibuster to block it. It's one of several bills, including those enshrining abortion access, that Democrats are proposing to confront the court's conservative majority. Another bill, guaranteeing access to contraceptive services, is set for a vote later this week.

Ahead of voting, a number of lawmakers joined protesters demonstrating against the abortion ruling outside the Supreme Court, which sits across from the Capitol and remains fenced off for security during tumultuous political times. The U.S. Capitol Police said among those arrested Tuesday were 16 members of Congress.“The extremist right-wing majority on the Supreme Court has put our country down a perilous path,” said Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon, D-Pa.

In fact, of all the Republicans who rose to speak during the morning debate, almost none directly broached the subject of same-sex or interracial marriage. But in a notable silence, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell declined to express his view on the bill, leaving an open question over how strongly his party would fight it, if it even comes up for a vote in the upper chamber.“I don’t see anything behind this right now other than, you know, election year politics,” said the GOP whip, Sen. John Thune of South Dakota.

But last month, writing for the majority in overturning Roe v. Wade, Justice Samuel Alito argued for a more narrow interpretation of the rights guaranteed to Americans, noting that the right to an abortion was not spelled out in the Constitution.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Wish that guy would pull his pants up

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 442. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Texas House report blames local, state and federal officers for 'systemic failure' in UvaldeAfter weeks of changes in the official narrative about the response, the report was the clearest, most-detailed picture yet of what happened in Uvalde, during which local, state and federal authorities waited for more than an hour to confront the gunman. 'It's the school's fault and those dang illegals. If it hadn't been for that, 400 of us would have stopped the massacre right quick'
Source: KUT - 🏆 77. / 68 Read more »

Secret Service Riot Conduct Raises 'Obstruction Of Justice' Concerns: Ex-White House LawyerWere agents “part of an effort to intimidate Cassidy Hutchinson? We need answers,” said Norm Eisen. If so, those agents need to be arrested & charged with witness tampering & any other applicable crime. NoOneUnscripted Jesus More Boole sheet conspiracy theories after Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony floundered.
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »