Political Lessons for Democrats in a Post-Roe America

  • 📰 NewYorker
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 59 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 27%
  • Publisher: 67%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Democrats could, in theory, amend the filibuster and expand the Supreme Court, JohnCassidy writes. But they “appear to be stuck—with an unrepresentative political system, a stacked Court, and their own divisions conspiring against them.”

the Second and Fourteenth Amendments protect “an individual’s right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home.”

The third lesson from the past few days is that brazenness and ruthlessness pay off, or, as Mitch McConnell might put it, “There are no absolute rules of conduct, either in peace or war. Everything depends on circumstances.” Actually, this quotation comes from Leon Trotsky’s, but he and McConnell aren’t so far apart. In the past few decades, the G.O.P.

With the midterms slightly more than four months away, Democrats are hoping that anger over last week’s rulings will increase turnout and win over some wavering voters. “This fall, Roe is on the ballot,” Joe Biden said on Friday. With the overturning of Roe coming on top of the gutting of state gun laws, this response didn’t seem entirely adequate. Whatever happens in November, there is no immediate prospect of a change in the Court.

In theory, a Democrat-controlled Congress could now pass legislation restoring a version of Roe, and challenge the Court to strike it down. Given that the Party has only fifty votes in the Senate, it would have to amend or abolish the filibuster to do this, and, on Friday, Bernie Sanders reiterated his call for this very course of action. Referring to the G.O.P.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

JohnCassidy In a nutshell. Or put another way, we're screwed.

JohnCassidy we're only 2 senators from making change happen VoteBlue2022 VoteBlueToSaveDemocracy

JohnCassidy And - go ahead. Stack the court. What happens when the other party is in power - they stack it further in their favor. Then it gets stacked again, again,…

JohnCassidy Whoever is in power wants to get rid of the filibuster. Whoever isn’t in power wants to keep it. All politicians and hard line Rs and Ds suck and are hypocrites. Nobody wants democracy- they want autocracy, totalitarianism for their party alone

JohnCassidy 2017: Rs held control of White House&Congress,Trump urged Senate Rs to eliminate filibuster. Then, it was Senate Ds who proudly defended the filibuster. 33 Senate Ds penned letter to Sens. Schumer, D-N.Y. and McConnell, R-Ky., warning of the perils of eliminating filibuster.

JohnCassidy So Democrats are stuck with minority rule until 2050 or whenever an authoritarian state is simply declared.

JohnCassidy And Biden's refusal to act!

JohnCassidy That type of thing worked out well for Harry Reid.

JohnCassidy They’re also like 4-5 votes short of a majority on breaking the filibuster. It isn’t just Manchin and Sinema tho everyone thinks it is.

JohnCassidy

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 90. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Musk fires back at Twitter suit in new court filingElon Musk responded formally on Friday to Twitter’s lawsuit against him, saying the court should reject Twitter’s request for a short trial in the next two months and arguing the case will be more complicated and technical than Twitter makes it out to be. I mean, that might have been true, but then he Tweeted a bunch of bonkers and patently untrue stuff that they can use as evidence in their favor. It's true, Twitter is trying to shame the U.S. legal system and the Judge in charge of the case by speeding things up when they know dam well that this is the end & their desire to get any money for Twitter is ending in their exploitation of them giving no f***s about democracy This and Woody Allen type , stepdaughter pregnancy is a awful, awful look.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

MSNBC contributor claims Supreme Court will allow 'authoritarian takeover' of U.S.The Nation's Elie Mystal told MSNBC host Tiffany Cross that Trump supporters will launch an 'authoritarian takeover' of the country 'made legal' by the Supreme Court. This guy is crazier than he looks and he looks pretty crazy! Where has he/her/they been? The authoritarian takeover started in the Spring of 2020. Absolutely correct.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Brittney Griner had a doctor's note for cannabis use, her lawyer tells Russian court'The attending physician gave Brittney recommendations for the use of medical cannabis,' said her lawyer, Maria Blagovolina. 'The permission was issued on behalf of the Arizona Department of Health.'
Source: KPBSnews - 🏆 240. / 63 Read more »

Griner's next court date in Russia scheduled for July 26American basketball star and two-time U.S. Olympics gold medalist Brittney Griner is set to appear next in a Russian courtroom on July 26.
Source: wrtv - 🏆 598. / 51 Read more »

Court documents in Polanski criminal case ordered releasedA California appeals court has ordered the unsealing of some documents in the criminal case against renowned director Roman Polanski, who's been a fugitive since pleading guilty to having sex with a 13-year-old girl decades ago. Full story
Source: kgun9 - 🏆 584. / 51 Read more »

Op-Ed: Dobbs isn't the first time the Supreme Court took away key rights'Reconstruction teaches us that when extremist movements tell you where they are headed, you should believe them. America should not go backwards on rights yet again,' writes Christopher M. Richardson, a former U.S. diplomat. (via latimesopinion) opinion
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »