Supreme Court Shouldn’t Be Able to Rule on Abortion, Ocasio-Cortez Says in New Push

  • 📰 truthout
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 59 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 27%
  • Publisher: 68%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is pushing to strip the Supreme Court of its ability to rule on abortion altogether — as well as marriage equality, sex and contraception.

As stories of the vast amounts of suffering caused by abortion bans are piling up, a group of House Democrats is calling on congressional leaders to support a push to strip the Supreme Court of its ability to rule on abortion — as well as marriage equality, sex and contraception — altogether.

Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez , Mondaire Jones and eight others sent a letter to Democratic leaders this week, asking them to lend their support to the idea. They say that the move is crucial — not only to potentially protect abortion rights, but also to protect rights like gay marriage, which the Supreme Court has indicated are next on the chopping block.

“We write to urge your support for restricting the Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction in the areas of abortion, marriage equality, non-procreative intimacy, and contraception,” the . “In doing so, we can ensure that, as Congress takes legislative action to codify each of these fundamental rights, a radical, restless, and newly constituted majority on the Court cannot further undermine the protections we would enact.”Roe v. Wade

, the letter writers said that Congress has a chance to fight back. Though it’s a long shot, Democrats in Congress are aiming to unite; in order to ensure that such a move would be effective, it is necessary for the legislative branch to pre-empt far right attacks on the bill and bar the Supreme Court from being able to overturn it.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

they're not fit to rule over wet toilet paper, they all lied at confirmation they're compromised, its a bad joke and nobody appreciates the threats, whose gonna owe the climate reparations, damn traitors, bribes, lets cut the crap and clean up the damn mess climatesecurity

TheseLongWars But she still insists on caucusing with that Dems on everything.

Right on Alexandria Courts should not legislate sexuality Pregnancies Geez

f.u.c.k. = fornication under consent of the king. an antiquated notion.

Yes--none of it belongs in the courts!

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 69. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Washington Supreme Court to decide capital gains tax caseThe Washington Supreme Court has agreed to review a decision by a lower court that overturned a new capital gains tax on high-profit stocks, bonds and other assets. FOX13 How about they review Roe versus Wade. Shameless Dangerous
Source: fox13seattle - 🏆 328. / 59 Read more »

Opinion | Right-Wing Zealots on the Supreme Court Threaten to Make American Theocracy a Reality'We must expand the Supreme Court. If we don't, six extremist judges will continue to overturn the will of voters and destroy our rights.'
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »

Op-Ed: Dobbs isn't the first time the Supreme Court took away key rights'Reconstruction teaches us that when extremist movements tell you where they are headed, you should believe them. America should not go backwards on rights yet again,' writes Christopher M. Richardson, a former U.S. diplomat. (via latimesopinion) opinion
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

House Democrats block GOP resolution capping number of Supreme Court justices at nineDemocrats in the House of Representatives blocked a Republican resolution seeking to amend the Constitution and cap the number of Supreme Court justices at nine. Please pay attention to US judicial corruption cases I was never a fan of this, the GOP will probably have control for quite a long time because of the majority but this is just greedy by wanting more justices. Let’s not complicate it any more than it already is!!! Good
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Montgomery County Ramps Up Enforcement Outside Supreme Court Justices' HomesProtests outside the homes of justices Brett Kavanaugh and John Roberts have been ongoing for weeks. Good. This is abhorrent behavior. Coincidentally this was also just reported: Yeah, that ain't how the First Amendment works. The police state is ramping up.
Source: DCist - 🏆 518. / 51 Read more »

“Today Would Be a Great Day” to Bind Supreme Court Justices to Ethics Code, Warren SaysIn May, Elizabeth Warren introduced a bill to hold justices to a binding ethics code and ban them from trading stocks. At this point it doesn’t matter what she says or does. She could have done this before, but now she’s rehabilitating her image from the gay conversion therapy she voted for and the erasure of 100 years of womens rights. SenWarren did that.
Source: truthout - 🏆 69. / 68 Read more »