By MARK SHERMAN and JESSICA GRESKO
The abortion case in particular was a repudiation of the more incremental approach favored by Chief Justice John Roberts. But the chief justice was unable to attract any support from his colleagues on the right, including the three justices nominated by former President Donald Trump. Obama nominated Merrick Garland, then a federal appeals court judge and now President Joe Biden’s attorney general, but Republicans would not even give Garland a hearing.
Without the votes, the court’s three-justice liberal minority could only look on in dismay, confined to writing dissents that were alternately scathing and sad. The dissent included a warning that “no one should be confident that this majority is done with its work.” The justices suggested the decision’s logic also imperiled previously recognized rights to same-sex marriage and contraception.
Liars, a horrible thing
I hope you guys are not the ones that convicted me. I am being set up. By Brighton Co police officers. I need help. I'm innocent. I swear in on it I am. Please pray for me. Thank you.
Look what money does. But were not getting our moneys worth.
Where do I apply for the copy editor job?
He has lost ALL credibility and it nothing more than a puppet
Guess that’s out the window. The court lost its legitimacy when deciding Bush v Gore. It’s only gotten worse.
What I think of that statement:
Kinda hard not to, don’t ya think? Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
AP PHOTOS: U.S. Supreme Court overturns abortion protectionThe U.S. Supreme Court issued a highly charged decision on Friday, June 24, 2022, that ends constitutional protections to abortion nearly 50 years after Roe v. Wade made abortion legal. Abortion-rights activists are protesting in the streets of U.S. What should we do? Eliminate the filibuster, Codify Roe, Increase the members of The Supreme Court! Eliminate the life time of the members of the Supreme Court! Let's do it now! Vote! Vote!
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court gun ruling sparks furor in New York, WashingtonNew York City Mayor Eric Adams warned that the ruling would allow for more guns on the streets and put residents at risk. Truly my gun at hone have save me more times than i can remmember with multiple intruders and never fired a shot The way New Yorkers be yeah y'all don't deserve guns but also murder is a law and it's sadly still done regardless it being a law So what's the difference? Stabbings still happen in the UK It shouldn’t. They can still make it hard to get a gun and they do. But no one should have to prove why they need one…Let’s flip it… if a woman came to get an abortion would you ask her to prove that she needed it? No.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
After Supreme Court gun decision, what’s next?The Supreme Court issued its biggest gun rights ruling in more than a decade
Source: WOKVNews - 🏆 247. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court expands gun rights, with nation dividedIn a major expansion of gun rights, the Supreme Court said Thursday that Americans have a right to carry firearms in public for self-defense, a ruling likely to lead to more people legally armed in… False, the Supreme stopped the government from overstepping its authority and attacking our rights. The purpose of the Bill of Rights is to limit the government, not citizens. Ok, sure, an unfettered right to keep and bear arms. But not to use them! We need to make it financially and legally ruinous to a gun owner if that gun is used to kill or injure someone, whether or not the owner pulled the trigger. Rights come with responsibilities, you know.
Source: denverpost - 🏆 13. / 72 Read more »
States brace for fight over gun laws after Supreme Court rulingGovernors, lawmakers, and attorneys general in states with strict gun-permitting laws are figuring out how to shore up their restrictions after Thursday's Supreme Court decision expanded gun rights in a New York case. It’s as if these state law makers just now learned that we have a second amendment. 'assault weapon' and 'high capacity magazine' bans were also shown to be unconditional too with the new strict scrutiny rule too The fact remains that restrictions are likely to be unconstitutional since the language of the second amendment is purposely unqualified.
Source: FOX26Houston - 🏆 448. / 53 Read more »