During the angst-laden wait for the Supreme Court’s ruling on, the court made hay trashing other vital precedents in its stampede to remake the country’s legal priorities in an extreme-right direction.
That Supreme Court-endorsed wall separating public funding from religious education started to break down in the following decade, as the court’s composition shifted rightward. In a six-three ruling issued Tuesday, the Supreme Court declared that the Maine restrictions were discriminatory against religion and against religious people, and ruled the law — which emerged out of the bedrock principle of separation of church and state — null and void.
Religious schools don’t have to adhere to state standards or abide by anti-discrimination laws — the schools involved in the lawsuit don’t accept gay students. Moreover, religious schools don’t have to teach secular subjects, such as science, that would be mandated in any public school.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
The “SCOTUS Guts The Establish Clause” EditionThe Supreme Court requires funding for religious schools, the Jan. 6 hearings, and dissension at progressive organizations.
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »
Opinion | A Good Week for Religious FreedomFrom WSJopinion: Cooperation between governments and religious schools doesn’t establish religion, and antireligious discrimination is inconsistent with the guarantee of free exercise, writes RickGarnett opinion RickGarnett If you show your attitude to me then I will show you my middle finger. opinion RickGarnett opinion RickGarnett Public schools deserve public funds.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court's religious school ruling signals 'dangerous road' for LGBTQ rights, advocates saySupreme Court's religious school ruling has sparked concerns about the potential implications of the ruling on LGBTQ rights. The two schools cited in the case have a history of homophobic and transphobic policies. - NBCOUT NBCOUT taxpayers paying for religious schools, the Miranda warning obliterated and guns! guns! guns! for everyone.... those 3 this week don't even include roe v wade, we lose the right to privacy, arrest warnings, and right to life this week from a court with a stolen seat and lies NBCOUT Shocker! Most Christian schools believe homosexuality is a sin and people should not behave in that manner. Also you are a national news agency; stop misusing the words homophobic and transphobic Nobody is afraid of people who live like that. Many people believe it to be wrong.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Maine religious schools might not participate in state tuition program, despite Supreme Court victoryBut the state attorney general said the ruling will be for naught unless the schools are willing to abide by the same anti-discrimination law as other private schools that participate in the program. That won’t happen and who’s moderating?
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »
Column: Banning abortion is the first step. Brace yourselves for the end of many hard-fought rightsAbcarian: Banning abortion is the first step. Brace yourselves for the end of many hard-fought rights (via latimesopinion) opinion Blablahblahblah opinion Republican Americans are the enemies of the free world, not just the enemies of democracy in the USA. Just like the German yatzhees in the 1930s, attacking human rights and fomenting terrorism after their failed coup goes unpunished. opinion When we have enough votes we're going to declare the bowel movements of Christians to be persons and make it illegal for them to take a dump.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »