Phoebe Bridgers Leads ‘F— Supreme Court’ Chant at Glastonbury

  • 📰 billboard
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 39 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 19%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Phoebe Bridgers led a 'F— Supreme Court' Chant at Glastonbury.

, when news broke that the Supreme Court had drafted plans to rescind women’s federal rights to seek abortions by overturning Roe v. Wade — something that inspired her to become one in a handful of female artists to share their own personal experiences with abortion.

“I’ve always found comfort in talking to people in passing – when someone’s mom says: ‘I had an abortion when I was a teen.’ It normalized it for me,” Bridgers explained to . “I was, ‘All right, it’s time to throw my hat into that pool…That’s not a phrase, I just made that up. But I didn’t think about it, really, at all.”

“As a white, upper-middle-class woman from California, even if it were to be overturned, I will always have access,” she continued. “I have a friend who went to medical school – every time I need a doctor, I say, ‘Do you have someone that you recommend?’ So I would just go: ‘Hey, where do I go for the thing? Wink-wink.’ The people with access will always have access. What pisses me off is that we’re not talking about me.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

she’s one of the best artists out there rn

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 112. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Demonstrator scales Frederick Douglass Bridge in DC after Supreme Court overturns Roe v. WadeA demonstrator scaled the Frederick Douglass Bridge in Washington, D.C. Friday morning following the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade. FOX13 Breaking: Supreme Court takes back decision based on this protest. People need to find better things to be outraged about…. Like inflation and how high the price of chicken is gonna be in a month BAHAHAHA OH NO! WE LIVE IN A VOUNTRY OF LAWS! democrats ONLY KNOW VIOLENCE AND WHINING! Not a winning midterm position. davidhogg111 already blamed Putin? BAHAHAHA
Source: fox13seattle - 🏆 328. / 59 Read more »

‘Devastating’: Texas protesters outside Supreme Court react to Roe v. Wade reversalAnti-abortion activists chanted “Goodbye, Roe” outside the U.S. Supreme Court after the ruling that overturned the landmark 1973 decision legalizing abortion. To understand how deeply corrupt and despotic Biden and his Democrats are, watch what happens when their voters launch a TRULY violent and deadly insurrection. Then you'll understand why Democrats must never be allowed to have power & control ever again. Time to return to the original intent of our Constitution! If the citizens of a state are evil enough to kill their children, let them but keep our babies free for life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. They look like happy, well adjusted people.
Source: dallasnews - 🏆 18. / 71 Read more »

Legal battles likely as divided states grapple with abortionThe Supreme Court's decision to end the constitutional right to abortion likely will lead to legal battles as already divided states grapple with the new landscape of abortion access
Source: WOKVNews - 🏆 247. / 63 Read more »

Ohio’s Jim Obergefell, namesake of landmark gay marriage case, concerned SCOTUS could turn to LGBTQ rights after abortion decisionJim Obergefell of Sandusky, who was a plaintiff in the 2015 landmark U.S. Supreme Court case legalizing same-sex marriage, is concerned about the future of gay rights after the U.S. Supreme Court’s Friday decision overturning Roe v. Wade. Let’s see if Thomas revisits Loving v Virginia! Vote Democrat to protect womens rights. And civil rights. And voters rights. And workers rights. And natures rights. And school childrens rights Yes it should all be left to the states, anything not explicitly in the constitution is up to the states or the people.
Source: clevelanddotcom - 🏆 301. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court ruling puts target on California gun lawsA U.S. Supreme Court ruling overturning a New York law on concealed carry will likely lead to a challenge of California gun laws. LMM1062
Source: CalMatters - 🏆 261. / 63 Read more »