Thomas said that "any substantive due process decision is 'demonstrably erroneous,'" quoting a 2020 Supreme Court decision,"[W]e have a duty to 'correct the error' established in those precedents," he added.in an interview Friday that Thomas' opinion encourages people who oppose marriage equality "to now start their engines and to come after those rights.
"What a dark day for our ability to control our own bodies, to make decisions about our own bodies," he said. "What a dark day for our right to privacy. What an incredibly dark day for women in our nation."The other side:
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Ohio’s Jim Obergefell, namesake of landmark gay marriage case, concerned SCOTUS could turn to LGBTQ rights after abortion decisionJim Obergefell of Sandusky, who was a plaintiff in the 2015 landmark U.S. Supreme Court case legalizing same-sex marriage, is concerned about the future of gay rights after the U.S. Supreme Court’s Friday decision overturning Roe v. Wade. Let’s see if Thomas revisits Loving v Virginia! Vote Democrat to protect womens rights. And civil rights. And voters rights. And workers rights. And natures rights. And school childrens rights Yes it should all be left to the states, anything not explicitly in the constitution is up to the states or the people.
Source: clevelanddotcom - 🏆 301. / 63 Read more »