Adams slams Supreme Court's NY guns ruling: 'A textbook case of theory colliding with reality'

  • 📰 WNYC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 50 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

'Last Monday, we had over 350,000 people visiting Times Square. Let's say just a third of them were carrying a gun. One person shoots a gun, everyone grabs for their gun,' Mayor Adams said following the Supreme Court's decision to strike down NY's gun law.

. What do you say to the New Yorkers who are nervous now? What does this decision actually mean for them in this moment?

Well, we have been meeting with our attorneys. We had a conversation with the governor and mayors of big cities in the state. And we have put together a coalition that will look at how we use our pre-existing laws to really, sort of, contain this crisis that the Supreme Court has created. A sensitive location, according to the attorneys, can be a school, a governmental building, but there are far too many other locations that are not in the area of a sensitive location.

Will the NYPD undergo new training now to prepare for more encounters with people who may be armed? And would they ask to see someone's carry permit and to ensure that when they do seize guns through searches or stop and frisk, that their cases stand up in court. That is the role of the police, a system that we have in place now. That is the purpose of having a law enforcement body: police officers, correction officers, parole officers, probation officers, court officers. We haven't –

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Everyday New Yorkers find ways to get guns anyway. At least there will be a record of people that have one.

Gothamist, your comments section used to be 'must-read' until non-local republican trolls decided to take it over to drown out liberal NYC voices a few years ago and now it is 'must-not-read'. Was reminded when I tried to read these comments.

Just the criminals right?

After today’s subway gun muggings how do you justify lawful citizens not being able to protect themselves? Only criminals can carry guns?

NYCMayor You’re protected by men with guns. Why can’t your constituents protect themselves in the same way? Is your life so much more valuable that it needs special protection? We do not think so.

Let the people working in high end stores carry. Those smash and grab robberies will stop REAL quick.

He supports only criminals carrying guns.

The streets are much safer under our current laws. Only dirty cops and private citizens that bribe cops should have guns.

Yes, he’s a hypocrite.

No, he just wants his staff members to. Look it up in the NYDailyNews archives.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 602. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Eric Adams says private NYC businesses can restrict gunsAdams insisted he would aggressively fight the high court’s decision to strike down the Empire State’s century-old law restricting firearms. I had a Million Mom March neighbor a long time ago in MD. I offered to make her a ‘Gun Free House’ lawn sign. For some reason, she declined.
Source: nypost - 🏆 91. / 67 Read more »

Adams says SCOTUS gun ruling has ‘made every single one of us less safe’“We can say with certainty this decision has made every single one of us less safe from gun violence,' Mayor Eric Adams said about the Supreme Court's decision.
Source: Gothamist - 🏆 456. / 53 Read more »