Gov. Kathy Hochul speaks at a meeting of The Interstate Task Force on Illegal Guns.New York’s elected leaders lined up to decry Thursday’supending a key element of the state’s gun control laws — and vowed to rework state laws to ensure central restrictions remain intact.
Hochul said she’d work with legislative leaders to craft a bill that would focus on restricting guns in "sensitive locations," and to change the process to get a permit for a concealed weapon. She also floated the idea of a special session. It does not mean anyone who legally owns a firearm will be able to carry their weapon in public automatically, Hochul’s counsel Liz Fine clarified. The state has different types of pistol permits – one that allows for someone to keep a handgun in their home or at their business, and another that allows them to carry it concealed in public.
“I would imagine that an individual who is seeking to obtain a permit for concealed carry would use this decision and go into an office today and apply for a permit,” Fine said. “The process will take whatever time it takes, but they will be able to rely on this Supreme Court case.”that local jurisdictions can craft restrictions on weapons in “sensitive places” like “schools and government buildings,” but found New York City as a whole didn’t qualify as such a sensitive place.
At a press conference with the mayor Thursday afternoon, NYPD Commissioner Keechant Sewell clarified that for New Yorkers on the ground, having an unpermitted gun in public is still a crime, despite the ruling.
It is a WIN for New York City, New Gun ranges/stores/classes What does that mean? MONEY & JOBS! A safer economy for all ! Rejoice! America was founded on violence! The British didn’t just hand this country over!
Nullify. Ignore the ruling and continue to refuse to issue the permits.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court shoots down NY rule that set high bar for concealed handgun licensesThe Supreme Court issued its decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, ruling on New York's regulations for concealed carry permits. Good. Americans love to murder their kids with the 2nd Amendment And still I am curious... Just how many lives did Cars cause by Country, And illegal or now legalized Cannibas...or other drugs that were laced with Fetenal...?
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Supreme Court strikes down N.Y. concealed carry gun lawThe majority opinion says it is a constitutional right to carry a weapon in public for self-defense purposes. Great news for America. Bad news for the anti gun left about time. meanwhile, in ny, cr1me up apx 30% since jan 20 2021, because the cr1m1nals know they'll walk. NYC is a w-rzone in major loss for public safety* FIFY
Source: axios - 🏆 302. / 63 Read more »
New York concealed carry case: Supreme Court rules against NY gun lawThe Supreme Court has ruled that New York's concealed carry statute that requires an individual to establish 'proper cause' in order to obtain a license violates the Constitution. Finally people of the left-wing radical States. We'll get some protection:-)
Source: FOX29philly - 🏆 570. / 51 Read more »
NY Gov. Hochul defiant after Supreme Court gun decision: 'We're just getting started'New York Gov. Kathy Hochul condemned a Supreme Court decision striking down a state law that restricted Americans' access to concealed carry permits Thursday.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Supreme Court says North Carolina Republicans can defend photo ID law in courtThe Supreme Court that leaders of North Carolina’s Republican legislature can step in to advocate for a voter ID law in court that they believe the state’s Democratic attorney general isn’t fighting hard enough to defend.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court rules against DaVita over dialysis coverageThe U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected kidney dialysis provider DaVita Inc's claims that an Ohio hospital's employee health plan discriminates against patients with end-stage renal disease by reimbursing them at low rates in hopes they would switch to Medicare. In a 7-2 decision authored by conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the court ruled that Marietta Memorial Hospital's employee health plan did not violate federal law by limiting benefits for outpatient dialysis because it did so without regard to whether patients had end-stage renal disease.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »