Supreme Court Strikes Another Blow Against Church-State Separation

  • 📰 NYMag
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 74 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 33%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

While “separation of church and state” is the time-honored manner of describing how to enforce the Establishment Clause, it is no longer subscribed to at all by many conservatives

Maine’s great champion of church-state separation, James G. Blaine. Photo: Corbis via Getty Images As observers tensely awaited potential landmark decisions on abortion and guns, on Tuesday the conservative majority of the U.S. Supreme Court took a big step on another contentious subject. In a 6-3 decision, the Court expanded its new doctrine that ensuring the constitutional “free exercise” of religion is more important than policing the document’s prohibition on the “establishment” of religion.

Roberts argued that a “neutral benefit program in which public funds flow to religious organizations through the independent choices of private benefit recipients does not offend the Establishment Clause.

Today, the Court leads us to a place where separation of church and state becomes a constitutional violation. If a State cannot offer subsidies to its citizens without being required to fund religious exercise, any State that values its historic antiestablishment interests more than this Court does will have to curtail the support it offers to its citizens.

, as evidenced in January, when Justice Neil Gorsuch referred to “the so-called separation of … church and state” in oral arguments in another case. Indeed, the conservative evangelicals who were once the most adamant defenders of the “wall of separation” now routinely dismiss it and interpret the Establishment Clause as simply prohibiting favoritism toward particular faith communities.

All in all, Carson v. Makin may represent only a measured extension of a new and alarming approach to “religious liberty” that Court conservatives embarked on in the Missouri and Montana cases. But its destination looks pretty radical from a longer perspective. It adds a bit of symbolic weight that the latest case arises from Maine, whose most distinguished statesman was the former U.S. House Speaker, senator, secretary of State, and 1884 Republican presidential nominee James G. Blaine.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 111. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court says Maine cannot bar religious schools from state tuition programThe Supreme Court ruled that the state of Maine must allow parents who receive taxpayer-funded tuition assistance payments to use them at religious schools, saying a ban on the practice had violated the First Amendment. 👏👏👏👏👏 HC_Richardson Tax the churches. Democrats would support this if the vouchers were going for drag queen story hours.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court rules for parents seeking state aid for religious schoolsSupreme Court says state's refusal to fund church schools in some cases amounts to religious discrimination. Separation of church and state is being destroyed by religious extremists 🚨🚨🚨
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »

Supreme Court Ruling Turns Separation of Church and State Into 'Constitutional Violation,' Warns Sotomayor'We are witnessing one of the most extreme Supreme Courts in modern history rewrite the most basic social commitments of our society,' said the head of one of the nation's largest teachers unions.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court rules Maine's exclusion of religious schools from state tuition program is unconstitutionalThe court ruled 6-3 along ideological lines. It's about time parents should be able to educate their under there religious values just like my parents did. And so glad my dad and mom did right for my sake. That’s great news! This is terrible news. NO more constatation. Soon the Baptist will make it illegal for other religion's to exist. That's why we had separation of church and state.
Source: ALNewsNetwork - 🏆 583. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court rules state funding can be used for religious educationThe Supreme Court has ruled that Maine cannot prevent families from using money from state programs for education on tuition for religious institutions. NBC's Pete Williams has details. I'm pretty certain most public schools are funded by state and local governments. No way out of paying your local taxes which go to the school in your district. Though state money follows the student wherever they choose to go. I wasn't aware they restricted religious schools Tax the fucking churches.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »