Concourt dismisses application seeking right to bury non-viable foetuses | The Citizen

  • 📰 TheCitizen_News
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 50 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 75%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Concourt said the lower court was mistaken in assuming that the act applies to and regulates the burial of foetuses.

In a unanimous judgement on Wednesday, the Constitutional Court set aside a North Gauteng High Court ruling allowing parents the right to choose to bury or cremate a foetus. Last April, the high court ruled in favour of the applicants, declaring some provisions of the Department of Home Affairs' Births and Deaths Registration Act unconstitutional.

The application was brought to the apex court – against home affairs and the minister of health – by the Voice of the Unborn Baby NPC and the Catholic Archdiocese of Durban. They sought to have the high court order confirmed, so that it could be legislated in order to allow parents who lost their offspring before 26 weeks of pregnancy to have an option of burying the foetus.

“The order of the High Court declaring Section 20 of Births and Deaths Registration Act invalid is not confirmed. The application is dismissed and each party is to pay its own costs,” read the judgement. According to government, Mngqibisa-Thusi’s order usurped legislative functions and contravened the principle of separation of powers.

“Where the evacuation or removal of some or all of the foetal remains from the mother takes place in a healthcare facility, the implication of such a declaration for hospitals and other healthcare service providers becomes a challenging question.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 6. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

'Inhumane' to deny parents right to bury foetus younger than 26 weeks - activistLester Kiewit spoke to Sonja Smith of Voice of the Unborn Baby, about the ConCourt ruling relating to the rights of parents who want to bury a foetus younger than 26 weeks.
Source: ewnupdates - 🏆 30. / 53 Read more »

High Court wrong about law on foetuses under 26 weeks old, ConCourt rules | News24The Constitutional Court has declined to confirm the constitutional invalidity of sections of the Births and Deaths Registration Act. | GroundUp_News GroundUp_News All parents irrespective of how old a ' fetus' is should be allowed to bury their loved one. Incinerating a fetus is barbaric and wrong. If anti abortionists say it wrong to abort because conception starts from the beginning then parents should have a right to bury a fetus/child GroundUp_News Then who should rule on this if the constitutional court declines to do so?
Source: News24 - 🏆 4. / 80 Read more »

UK could ditch European rights pact after Rwanda plan blocked | The CitizenThe last-gasp intervention forced the UK government to cancel the first flight on Tuesday night.
Source: TheCitizen_News - 🏆 6. / 75 Read more »

Government faces legal action over Zimbabwe Exemption Permit non-renewal | The CitizenThe Helen Suzman Foundation says it will challenge government's decision in court We allowed peeps into our khaontry who broke our immigration laws, now they're using our own courts to right their wrongs..🙄 Boring
Source: TheCitizen_News - 🏆 6. / 75 Read more »