published in 2018, in which Heard called herself a “public figure representing domestic abuse.” Heard never named Depp as her abuser. Still, Depp claimed that the opinion piece hurt his career. Heard then countersued, claiming that Depp’s attorney Adam Waldman, as an agent of Depp, defamed her by calling her allegations “a hoax” in theMany legal experts doubted that Depp would win the case: The actor had lost a similar libel suit in the U.K.
Before the appeals process even begins, experts say it’s likely that Heard will have to put up some sort of bond that shows she has or can raise the money that she owes Depp. Given that Heard and her lawyers have said this trial has been a financial burden for the actor, Heard’s ability to post the bond is not guaranteed.
According to experts, there are a number of arguments Heard’s team could make. Her attorney Elaine Bredehoftafter the trial that would seem to suggest that she will focus on evidence. She has suggested that some pieces of evidence Depp was able to introduce were “prejudicial” while certain evidence from Heard’s team was “suppressed” at trial, including evidence that was permitted in the U.K. trial but not the U.S. one.
“I actually think that’s a pretty good argument,” says Sullivan. “What was so extraordinary about this trial is the social media and news coverage of it, kind of a circus of public opinion. With this case, you have your jury going home, their families have certainly been following this. They see the TikToks and the tweets. And the unsequestered jury is being exposed to things that were not admissible in the trial.
👍
These legal “experts” clearly haven’t ever tried cases or handled appeals. Trials & hearings are open to the public. The fact that it was televised has no bearing on the outcome unless Heard proves that jurors breached their oath to no go on the internet or social media.
No one gives af bro share the Epstein list
DUDE, EVERYONE SHOULD STOP TALKING ABOUT HER 'COURT TROUBLES'. YOU ARE OBVIOUSLY, NOT HELPING HER SITUATION. YOU JUST THROW THIS IN?! JUST TO HAVE A STORY?! WE ALL KNOW YOU NEVER REPORT THIS SHIT. FORGET YOU, . YOU'RE A TABLOID NOW. TOXIC.
This golddigger having been proven guilty is caught in a vicious circle to prove innocent There go her ' me too ' dreams
Her defenders are getting straight up nasty. She is indefensible. Just stop.
I'm tired of seeing and hearing this woman. And I'm sure a lot of people like me are thinking the same thing. 🤮
„But if people who merely retweet news stories can be held responsible for defamation if the article is inaccurate, that might present major First Amendment problems for millions of Twitter users.“ AmberHeard WROTE it, she is not a random twitter user.
Tough rocks, sweetie.
Amber is not 'facing a $15 million dollar judgement.' She's facing a $10.35 million judgement. But you guys don't even note that for the readers. Another journalist messing up coverage of this case.
No chance in Hell !!
Zero?
They need to get a top notch mediator, sort this out like civilised adults, release some sort of carefully drafted joint public statement - and make an agreement they'll stick to that they resist all efforts by fans/media outlets/civil rights organisations to re-ignite this drama
Jury unlikely going to say they were influenced by social media. Sexual allegations unproven. She posted the op-end to her social media acc. Admitted it was about Depp.
you have the personnel and money to pay someone to watch the trial, so you can provide accurate takes on it. Do that, please. All of this shoddy reporting is an affront to journalism.
They awarded on his claims, because they believed the allegations were a hoax. They awarded on her second claim that spoke about a set up for the 2nd police visit, because both sets of police officers (3 testified) stated they did nor see any bruises nd the apt wasn't in disarray
What a truly nice person Amber is: “She was great. I worked with her on the first ‘Aquaman,’ now the second one ... She’s terrific. I had a great experience with her. She was very kind, nice to the crew, nice to everybody.' Dolph Lundgren (Momoa agrees)
That she will end up paying everything to lawyers..
Does anyone really care?
Good read as far as structure, while also subtly and deliberately misleading. One particular point I can mention as some who actually watched the trial, when Judge Azacarte admonished the jury, each night of the 6-week trial, she didn't simply state for them not to watch the news
Can anyone gets around craping in someone bed and call it a joke. Smdh.
She will lose on appeal. Her lies were just too obvious. And on what grounds would she appeal? The judge let in too many evidence? The trial was televised? So what?
OH, HELL YES. TAKE THIS PIRATE DOWN!!!
This case was a travesty if people can’t believe that an older man loved her so much, she knew it, plotted against him for his money, involved people to a certain extent for evidence but they never saw anything and used being a woman.
Please go listen to a recording where she herself says oh it’s not like A. Im in a fight club. Or B. I’ve been plotting this all along gathering up stuff to later take you to court, even phone calls to tie in with what I’m saying. Telling people about it without evidence. Heresay
Where's the hard hitting news about HunterBidenLaptop? JoeBiden Inflation? illegalimmigration? Oh, that's right, Time is Propaganda news.
I hope she appeals, this verdict was a travesty. I can see how reliving all the abuse and vitriol would be excruciating though.
And another distraction from the real story of the week
I think she ´ll lose time and money. So obvious her lies!!!
It seems she has an exceptional imagination.
0%
Look at her how innocent she is looking. i understand also she is an actres but justice should also with all
Some one heard her Voice She is Crying from heart.
edockterman Again time she sh!t in the bed. Might be “Time” to give up on trying to make her the victim. Most of us watched the trial.
edockterman ஓடி ஓடி துணைநலத்தை தேட தோற்றது எப்படி என்றுணர இல்லாது இருக்கும் அப்பாவை நாடி நாடி அவரின் வலி வாழ்க்கையில் வெற்றிபெற எவ்வளவு வலி கொண்டு வழி அறிந்திருப்பார் என ஒருகணம் எண்ணின் உலக உயிர்கள் எல்லாம் துணை ஆகாது அறியாது போது என்றெண்ணி அறிந்தவர்கள் மட்டுமே துணை என்றனர்.
edockterman 'On appeal, there would be no cameras and no opportunity for Heard’s testimony to be picked apart, edited, and misconstrued on social media.'We saw the trial live. Her story in the morning don't match her story in the afternoon. No edition or picked apart articles could mask lies
edockterman The jury was unimious. I do not think she will win an appeal.
edockterman She should appeal They legal system failed her
edockterman Just trying to prove herself right, somehow
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Daily Mail Online - 🏆 135. / 51 Read more »
Source: DailyMailCeleb - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »
Source: DailyMailCeleb - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »
Source: DailyMailUK - 🏆 7. / 90 Read more »