You deserve what you get: the Depp-Heard trial was the voice in every victim’s ear

  • 📰 smh
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 51 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 24%
  • Publisher: 80%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

You deserve what you get: the Depp-Heard trial was the voice in every victim’s ear | jacquelinemaley

“Tonight’s whinging b–tch will be quickly forgotten once your powerful doco hits. The whole world is sick of this pathetic bullshit,” Jarratt texted to his mate. Jarratt was referring to a TV special McLachlan did to defend his name against allegations of sexual harassment and abuse made against him in an investigation by the ABC and Nine newspapers.

Women walk through the world knowing, vaguely, about what Donald Trump called “locker-room talk”. But because we’re not present in the locker room, this mysterious talk is a grey area that could lie anywhere on a spectrum. It’s confronting to realise just how far that spectrum extends, to know that this, actually, is what qualifies as japery among some men; this is how they chat when their guard is down, and they can be what Hollywood types might call their “authentic selves”.

It also heard that his ex-wife had hit him too, had taunted him while he was drug-addled and low, and had not given to charity the entirety of her divorce settlement, as she had pledged she would. As the #metoo movement picked up pace a few years ago, we heard again and again that it was a witch-hunt; vigilante justice with the absolute wrong sort of person wielding the pitchfork – the emotional, angry woman. We heard that it would destroy the reputations of the men named as perpetrators and harassers.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

JacquelineMaley Saying terrible behind closed doors is completely different to actual abuse. And yes, just conveniently ignore all the real evidence of abuse inflicted by Amber. Are you not the one spitting in the face of victims? Domestic violence is gender neutral.

JacquelineMaley Who gets Pistol & Boo? smh 9NewsAUS theage 2GB873

JacquelineMaley naw…a widdaw femanist is a widdaw sad wiff losing…☹️

JacquelineMaley The narrative you are spreading is unfounded. The reason a country like America has a judicial system is to bring justice to those who deserve it. In this case the evidence presented proved that Amber Heard is a pathological liar.

JacquelineMaley Jaqueline Maley: I didn't watch the trial and made up bullshit claims - and faced our cultures wrath. That has to change.

JacquelineMaley How can you conclude: 'Male reputation is more valuable than female safety.' Did you even bother watching the trial? How about: 'male safety is more valuable than a feminist narrative'? And how about: 'truth is more important than an edgy article'?

JacquelineMaley So now think about how many other women claimed DV and bung on about how they survived and this is actually what happend

JacquelineMaley Did you just copy WaPo's utter bullsh!t?

JacquelineMaley So basically to protect women victims, men should be convicted in every case even when innocent. Because if an innocent man walks away from his accuser unpunished it's bad for all female victims. The author should be in Court herself for spreading hatred through sexism Amber lied

JacquelineMaley In effect stating alleged victims never lie and all accused persons are guilty, thus there are no reasons for trials.

JacquelineMaley You’re a genuine human being when you’re attacked by a NPD person!

JacquelineMaley Did this ‘reporter’ watch any of this trial? Don’t bother, it’s a rhetorical question. It’s far too obvious that she didn’t. Even feminists are saying this is NOT about gender, but about true victims of abuse, who can also be men. Shame on you misandrists, for hijacking this!

JacquelineMaley Jacqueline, Amber Heard clearly lied and has made it so much harder for real, actual victims of domestic abuse to be believed. No matter male or female. Stop enabling abusers.

JacquelineMaley Wrong. this is feminist denial of the truth and evidence.

JacquelineMaley But amber is not a victim

JacquelineMaley Great article. I think the UK courts got it right with this. I believe Amber Heard.

JacquelineMaley How is this your take away from that trial? Is your assumption no one saw the trial.

JacquelineMaley She said, “two years ago, I became a public figure representing domestic abuse”. Seems to me the trial demonstrated abuse in their relationship. Is not truth a defense for defamation?

JacquelineMaley I would like to know how much these articles are getting paid to promote Heard as the victim. They are appearing every single day and go against everything we have seen transpire in the Court Case. They are determined to maintain Heard as the victim. AmberHeardIsALiar

JacquelineMaley Good God, how absurdly wrong is this article. You don't seem to get it. Heard has set the MeToo movement back decades and these hit pieces on the Heard/Depp Court ruling minimises true victims of domestic violence. AmberHeardIsALiar

JacquelineMaley 'She hit him too, and taunted him' as a throwaway sentence in this article doesn't really seem to accurately depict the situation. Most sensible people would look at this whole thing as two sets of toxic behaviour. Only one went to the press to destroy the other though.

JacquelineMaley I don't get why all these articles framing the verdict as a blow for women omit that Amber lied the whole time. She lied about being abused and feigned symptoms of PTSD. Her lies are a huge part of the story and no analysis is complete without mentioning them.

JacquelineMaley Fun fact: Male victims of domestic abuse are far less likely to report it to the police for fear of not being believed, ridicule, & embarrassment. All articles like this do, JacquelineMaley, is ensure more victims will be abused in silence. Evidence 'Testimony'. He had both.

JacquelineMaley Appears there were two victims of DV, one outed the other, claimed to be the only victim and made it public and destroyed the others career, the other victim said enough is enough and took her to court, two people at fault, two victims no winners

JacquelineMaley Jacqueline, you are obsessed with the purity of females and the Satanic evil of males. You bring this strong obsessive prejudice to everything you write. And the SMH gives you free reign!

JacquelineMaley I really liked your point about Depp being allowed to be complex dark difficult and flawed Amber was not allowed the same complexity of character She had a different standard to up hold she had to be perfect If not she was to blame

JacquelineMaley wait didnt she literally take a shit on his bed?

JacquelineMaley Crap, it was two mad rich actors airing their dirty laundry in public, it hasn’t got much to do with the real world. They are both spoiled brats having tantrums

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 6. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Heard-Depp trial is a reality TV check for #MeTooVicious insults against Amber Heard will no doubt make it harder for women to report domestic violence, but that does not mean all women’s accusations against men must be believed. Women, too, are capable of being wrong - and violent. Can we all just move on from this. What's said has been said. The trigger has been pulled. There were wrongs and there were rights. The media has picked the carcass clean. Let it rot. MeToo
Source: brisbanetimes - 🏆 13. / 67 Read more »

Media 'loses reader trust' by painting Johnny Depp trial as 'misogynistic'An attempt by journalists to discredit Johnny Depp's legal victory against Amber Heard as 'misogyny' is why readers are losing faith in legacy journalism, writes Jack Houghton. Oh hilarious that's been going on now for the last 8 years, the Media is worse then the sewer these days. Legacy journalism… FFS - I’d say old journos investigated and wrote about serious issues. Not this mindless blather. Is there a reason this article does not explicitly note the UK judgement which found clear evidence of domestic violence? Why is the US court rendered to be an appropriate decision, but the UK court is expunged from consideration (and FTR quoting Heard doesn't count)?
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »

Heard’s attorney mentions ‘quite a few different objections she had’ with Depp trialHeards lawyer loses a 'defamation case' so goes on national TV representing AH to defame JD again AND the judge, jury and judicial process itself. Unbelievable. This means AH could be sued 'again' which is maybe what she wants for another pay day. Good hearing Depp won. The verdict is nothing about money influence, good to see a physical and oral violent selfish girl got punishment in front of truth, no matter how beautiful she is. I don't think Depp was happy with this process, but got release as he cares about friends.
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »

‘Toxic catastrophe’: Johnny Depp won his case but everyone else losesSome fear the verdict could have chilling implications for survivors of domestic abuse, discouraging people from coming forward. | FarrahTomazin deppvsheard johnnydepp amberheard FarrahTomazin he is a saviour of domestic abuse. The absolute bias of this article is astounding. Surely we have moved passed the all women are truthful and men liars starting point? Apparently not. FarrahTomazin FarrahTomazin
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »