Trump spars with Chief Justice John Roberts in unprecedented dispute over judges’ independence

  • 📰 nationalpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 80%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

‘We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges. What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges,’ Roberts said

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

It isnt unprecedented

John Roberts should just zip it and focus his time on completely missing the point on key judicial decisions.

fake news. Trump said Roberts can say what he wants

Unprecedented? Bless you historical illiterates. Anyone at the NP ever hear of the Nullification Crisis?

With the cash JT gave you, you will report on anti-Trump and US and protect JT? Journalism is dead!

Does the National Post receive subsidies from Canadian Tax Payers ?

What gets in the way of a dictator? The supreme law of a constitution and an independent judiciary that will uphold it?

Judges should only ever be on 1 side, the side of the LAW they should have no leanings towards Republicans or Democrats Any judge that has demonstrated a side politically should be recused from any political cases, they are suppose to be OBJECTIVE & IMPARTIAL at all times!

The democrat socialist judges sure show that it is exactly what they are

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 10. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts rebukes Trump over ‘Obama judge’ commentThe Chief Justice defended the U.S. Supreme Court after Trump called a judge who ruled against his asylum policy as an ‘Obama judge’ Big deal. Globe & Mail , what a rag.
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »

President Trump tried to order Justice Department to prosecute Hillary Clinton, James ComeyThe lawyer, Donald McGahn, rebuffed the president, saying that he had no authority to order a prosecution but will he prosecute his own daughter Interesting he is not willing to place sanctions against the crown prince of Saudi Arabia after mounting evidence of him ordering an assassination in Turkey but willing to to try everything in the books agAinst his opponents. wakeupAmerica Good -these two are the roots of problems that exist in the US today - so prosecute -Mueller has wasted two years on the Republicans and has found nothing-give a Republican investigator two months and these two will be done
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »

Trump wanted to order the Justice Department to prosecute James Comey and Hillary ClintonIt’s one of the most blatant examples yet of how Trump views the typically independent Justice Department as a tool to be wielded against his political enemies why is DoJ refusing to prosecute crimes? LockHerUp Duh. There is actual evidence of their crimes.
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »