Review finds US troops didn't violate law in Syria airstrike

  • 📰 AP
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 45 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 21%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The U.S. military committed procedural mistakes following a 2019 airstrike in Syria that killed dozens, including women and children, but an investigation has concluded the U.S. did not violate the law of war or deliberately cause civilian casualties.

The investigation comes amid new scrutiny on the U.S. military for strikes that cause innocent deaths. And it has all prompted Austin to order the department to create a new “Civilian Harm Mitigation and Response Action Plan” to better prevent civilian deaths in military operations. He also ordered Army Gen. Michael Garrett, currently the head of U.S. Army Forces Command, to do an independent review of the Baghuz strike.

The strike killed a longtime employee of an American humanitarian organization and nine of his family members, including seven children. The U.S. has promised to pay financial reparations to the family, and potentially get them out of Afghanistan, but none of that has happened yet. The initial investigation into the attack concluded that the strike constituted legitimate self-defense in support of Syrian partner forces under fire from the Islamic State group. Garrett, in his investigation, agreed with that conclusion.

Asked why no one was being held personally accountable for the civilian deaths, Pentagon press secretary John Kirby said Tuesday that Austin was holding the department accountable, and that’s why he ordered changes in the process.“I understand the questions about accountability, I get it,” Kirby told Pentagon reporters. “In this case, Gen.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Well of course not because that would be insane to deliberately cause civilian casualties. A family was killed so you answers for that?

We kill ourselves, we review ourselves, we punish ourselves (kinda), The Greatest Perpetrator of Human Rights, The Greatest Invader in the current times. And if others don’t like us we put sanctions on them.

Imagine if Russian military were to investigate Russian military actions in Ukraine and concluded that they didn't violate the law of war

JimLaPorta 'Putin found Putin did nothing wrong.' wait. oh shit.

Killing dozens of civilians at one strike is no war crime, neither is concealing it for two years. How come the USA is in the sole privilege to define 'war crime'.

But war crimes when Russia does it

Of course not🙄

The US exonerating themselves before the next push...

Many other events such as in Libya, Afghanistan, and others. Didn't violate the law, did it? Whatever you say, the world doesn't believe you any longer.

US military has investigated itself and concluded that no law has been violated

It wasn't deliberate it was blue on blue. Highlights the futility of war.

Does Russia get to investigate themselves too? How does this work exactly?

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 728. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

US absolves itself from civilian killings in Syria strikePentagon finds no wrongdoing in the 2019 air strike that reportedly killed 70 civilians in eastern Baghouz town, saying its probe found no violation of rules of engagement or law of war. Haha this a joke US and Israel kill everyday in Palestine and they find it humane ... US can not absolve themselves for the killing of civilians as casualties of war. The only way you absolve someone is by paying with life, the only way to be acquitted from their sin! 🌎😱🍀
Source: trtworld - 🏆 101. / 63 Read more »

NYC Man Pleads Guilty for Brutal 2019 Sexual Assault of 74-Year-Old Queens WomanA 28-year-old man pleaded guilty for the brutal 2019 sexual attack of a 74-year-old Queens woman in her apartment, prosecutors announced Friday. Rodrigo Escamilla, from Corona, pleaded guilty to criminal sexual act in the first degree Thursday, Queens District Attorney Melinda Katz said. Queens Supreme Court Justice Ushir Pandit-Durant said she looks to sentence Escamilla to 15 years in prison… He is twisted. Evil when you do it to anyone, but really very twisted when done to an almost 80 year old, and they perpetrator is in his 20s. Definitely a good candidate for old sparky
Source: NBCNewYork - 🏆 270. / 63 Read more »