Under prior campaign finance rules, candidates could only raise up to $250,000 after an election to reimburse themselves.Under the court's ruling, a candidate who lends millions to his or her campaign is now in a position to solicit that — plus far more in traditional donations — after they've been elected and hold office.
Wealthy candidates often argue they will avoid any conflicts of interest while in office by self-financing their campaigns. Now, they have an unfettered way to make themselves whole after voters have gone to the polls.The Supreme Court disagreed with any concerns as it ruled in a case brought by Sen. Ted Cruz .
"The Government is unable to identify a single case of quid pro quo corruption in this context," wrote Chief Justice John Roberts in his majority opinion.Under Supreme Court precedent, it requires an explicit quid pro quo; buying access and influence generally isn't considered a corrupt act in itself.Campaigns this cycle that have candidate loans on the books will be able to take advantage of the new rules after their elections.
dschmidthawk 1920
I really don't know if America's democracy is going to survive.
Oh great
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Pelosi says Supreme Court is dangerous to families and freedomAsked about criticism that Democrats did not foresee anti-abortion activists' work, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi lashed out against the high court. Pelosi needs to retire. So As long as the court agrees with everything she says the court is fabulous but since they disagreed with her they are dangerous……… Go figure
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »
NYT’s Maureen Dowd: ‘Catholic,’ ‘churchly ethos’ of Supreme Court threatens to turn America ‘upside down’New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd claimed several Supreme Court justices are imposing the Catholic faith on the nation with the potential dismantling of Roe v Wade.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Clarence Thomas compares Supreme Court abortion leak to infidelitySupreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas compared the leak of a draft opinion indicating Roe v. Wade will soon be overturned to infidelity. Time to find out who leaked
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Lisa Holder White, First Black Woman on Illinois Supreme Court, Reflects on Historic Nature of AppointmentThe Illinois Supreme court will soon have its first Black woman justice as Fourth District Appellate Court Judge Lisa Holder White is set to replace Justice Rita Garman this summer. We spoke with Holder White about her new role. BlackVoicesWTTW
Source: wttw - 🏆 520. / 51 Read more »
Leak puts the trust critical to Supreme Court deliberations at risk: Ted DiadiunSupreme Court justices have taken an oath to look at every side of issues, alongside others who have taken a similar oath. They can be persuaded by their colleagues, they can change their minds – but they must have utter, complete trust that this deliberative process is done in a safe space. Laws can be made, revised and unmade. It's the nature of our democratic process. Loss of trust in and by our foundational institutions could, sadly, be far more durable, writes Ted Diadiun in his column today. Democrats want there to be distrust in our judicial system…. It makes it easier for them to tear down the entire system like they want Psst. A sitting Justice has a wife that was part of a coup attempt of a duly elected president. Scotus has no credibility as long and Thomas sits on the bench. If the wife is a traitor, bet he is too
Source: clevelanddotcom - 🏆 301. / 63 Read more »
Listen now: Concerns over the Supreme Court leak, following severe weather warnings and more!🎧 Need audio for your commute, workout or to help time pass on the job? Here are our latest podcast episodes for you to follow!
Source: TucsonStar - 🏆 339. / 59 Read more »