Most House Republicans supported Ukraine aid. This N.J. congressman did not.

  • 📰 njdotcom
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 42 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 20%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Most U.S. House Republicans supported sending $40 billion more in aid to Ukraine to help the country fend off the Russian invasion. One N.J. congressman did not.

Joe Warner | For NJ Advance MediaNew Jersey Rep. Jeff Van Drew was one of only 57 House Republicans who opposed sending $40 billion more in aid to Ukraine to help the country fend off the Russian invasion., including the other 11 members of New Jersey’s congressional delegation. No Democrats voted no.

“With this aid, the United States is sending a powerful message to the oligarchs in the Kremlin: We remain firm in our belief that Ukrainian freedom will triumph over Russian fascism,” said Rep. Donald Norcross, D-1st Dist. The Ukraine aid bill now goes to the U.S. Senate, where Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., called for a quick vote there as well.

“The president has called on both chambers of Congress to act quickly, so act quickly we must,” Schumer said Wednesday. “The House vote was overwhelmingly bipartisan and it should be no different in this chamber.”His vote aligned with those cast by some of the most conservative members of the House Republican Conference, including Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, Madison Cawthorn of North Carolina, Jim Jordan of Ohio and Mary Miller of Illinois.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

This surprises anyone?

Good. The federal govt should be worried about the American people. We have out of control inflation due to the reckless spending by the democrats as well as open border problems among other concerns.

Jeff Van Drew is always looking for the barrels bottom.

Good. We should be pushing for a peaceful resolution, not fighting a proxy war using Ukrainian lives.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 282. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines