Crystal Mason’s contentious illegal voting conviction must be reconsidered, criminal appeals court says

  • 📰 TexasTribune
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 65 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 29%
  • Publisher: 53%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

New: The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has told a lower appeals court to reconsider the controversial illegal voting conviction of Crystal Mason.

Crystal Mason in Fort Worth in 2019. She was convicted of voting illegally in the 2016 election, but her case has remained on appeal., our daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.

On Wednesday, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ruled that the lower court had “erred by failing to require proof that [Mason] had actual knowledge that it was a crime for her to vote while on supervised release.” They sent the case back down with instructions for the lower court to “evaluate the sufficiency” of the evidence against Mason.

A trial court judge convicted her of illegally voting, then-a second-degree state felony, after a poll worker testified he watched Mason read, and run her finger along, each line of an affidavit. Mason said she did not read the entire affidavit. At trial, a supervisor from the probation office overseeing her release testified that no one from that office had informed her she was still ineligible to vote.

The court on Wednesday ruled against Mason on two other issues. They rejected her arguments that the lower court had interpreted the state’s illegal voting statute in a way that criminalized the good faith submission of provisional ballots, and that the appeals court had wrongly found she “voted in an election” even though her provisional ballot was never counted.

But the legal landscape underpinning Tarrant County’s prosecution shifted while the case was under review, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals noted.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Intent means shit. Voter fraud is voter fraud. Line em up with chains. Criminals

She has zero chance of getting out of jail. Poster child.

provisional ballots are not even counted until they are investigate and an election official and a supervisor TOLD HER TO FILL IT OUT she should have never been charged and she should sue everyone involved in this into the dirt

She's guilty. There's nothing controversial about that.

About damn time

Absolutely incredible this is still ongoing.

By controversial you mean clearly excessive (no insurrectionist has gotten a similar sentence), politically motivated (suppress the vote), and horribly unjust given that people registered in 3 states like Mark Meadows apparently can traipse around with no fear of an indictment.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 441. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Former Toronto pastor loses second appeal in 2011 drowning of pregnant wifeOntario’s Court of Appeal has also dismissed Philip Grandine’s appeal of the 15\u002Dyear prison sentence handed to him in January 2020.
Source: TheStarPhoenix - 🏆 253. / 63 Read more »

New York AG's lawsuit again Amazon dismissed by appeals court | EngadgetThe lawsuit claimed that Amazon violated healthy and safety measures and retaliated against workers.. Engadget and never proofreading name a better duo
Source: engadget - 🏆 276. / 63 Read more »

Biden administration asks U.S. Supreme Court to shun Bayer weedkiller appealPresident Joe Biden's administration on Tuesday asked the U.S. Supreme Court not to hear Bayer AG's bid to dismiss claims by customers who contend that its Roundup weedkiller causes cancer, as the company seeks to avoid potentially billions of dollars in damages.
Source: ReutersScience - 🏆 559. / 51 Read more »

Ohio Supreme Court upholds involuntary manslaughter conviction in deadly Cleveland shootingA man prohibited from using guns but did so anyway can be found guilty of involuntary manslaughter, regardless of why they are not allowed to use weapons, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday.
Source: clevelanddotcom - 🏆 301. / 63 Read more »