, which means “before the forum.” Dictionary.com classifies “forensic” as an adjective with this definition: “Relating to, used in, or appropriate for courts of law or for public discussion or argumentation.” In short, be it chemistry, or anthropology, anything with “forensic” is basically any field that is applied to the law.
One of the crucial differences between a police detective and a forensic scientist is the approach—given the available pieces of evidence, the former would try to identify who is/are the perpetrator, while the latter would try to figure outan incident of interest happened. So yeah, that classic rock anthem “Who are You” by The Who may not be an appropriate theme at all for a popular television show about forensic scientists.
There have been many disputes about crowd estimates as well. To find out crowd density and uncover any misrepresentation or overestimation, passionate folks have conducted their very own scrutiny by using Google maps and other readily available websites to prove or disprove assessment provided by the police or the political party involved, while relying on their aptitude on geography, proxemics, and statistics.
Another approach detects incremental and extreme fraud from the concurrent statistics of vote and turnout numbers. According to a study led by complex systems scientist Peter Klimek: “Incremental fraud means that, with a given rate, ballots for one party are added to the urn and/or votes for other parties are taken away. Extreme fraud corresponds to reporting a complete turnout and almost all votes for a single party.