Hawley said the leak to Politico reporting the high court's apparent decision to overturn Roe, a five-decade-old ruling finding a constitutional right to privacy that extends to abortion access, with its ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, an abortion case argued before the justices this term, was a stunt aimed at reversing the outcome."I have to tell you — it sounds real to me," Hawley told Fox News's Sean Hannity.
Hawley maintained that the Constitution was"silent" on abortion and that it should be left to the states to decide. "It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people's elected representatives," he added.
HawleyMO Odd that Republicans are concerned about the privacy of the Supreme Court, but not the privacy of women.
HawleyMO Ya think?
HawleyMO Ya think?
HawleyMO God forbid there’s some transparency and the public has a say in matter that effect them
HawleyMO Very astute observation
HawleyMO It's more than that . The Democrats are desperate to stop the Midterm beating so use unethical leaks to raise Hell and hope it stems the losses in November.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Rape case against pastor moving forward after Utah Supreme Court rulingA case against a former pastor accused of repeatedly sexually abusing a minor in his congregation is set to move forward once again following a ruling from the Utah Supreme Court.
Source: KSLcom - 🏆 549. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court Seems Torn on Whether Biden Can End Trump’s Inhumane Asylum PolicyThe “Remain in Mexico” policy imperils asylum seekers who become victims of predatory violence. Says what we need to know about SCOTUS :( Under the US Constitution and the international law (to which we are part of), court has no choice but to end Trump's inhumane asylum policy. The only inhumane treatment that’s going on is being committed by the DNC Against the American people.
Source: truthout - 🏆 69. / 68 Read more »
Supreme Court Says Boston Should Have Allowed Christian Flag on City Property“Boston’s flag-raising program does not express government speech,” Justice Stephen Breyer wrote for the Supreme Court, which reversed a lower court’s judgment.
Source: nbcchicago - 🏆 545. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court rules for group in dispute with Boston over flying Christian FlagJUST IN: A unanimous Supreme Court ruled that the city of Boston violated the First Amendment when it denied a civic group from flying the Christian Flag from city hall flagpoles to mark Constitution Day. Tell me it’s time to expand the court without saying it’s time to expand the court. Was that the issue of the day, really Separation of church and state. This ruling goes against it.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court says Boston violated First Amendment in Christian flag caseNEW: The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that Boston violated the First Amendment when it said a local organization could not fly a Christian flag in front of City Hall. aka Crusader flag Clearly, it's time for followers of the Flying Spaghetti Monster to raise their flag and start sculpting again! Christ had a flag? Did it look like this 🇵🇸? Or this 🇮🇱?
Source: axios - 🏆 302. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court rules against Boston in Christian flag caseA unanimous Supreme Court ruled Monday that Boston violated the free speech rights of a conservative activist when it refused his request to fly a Christian flag on a flagpole outside City Hall. Remove the flagpole. There are better venues and symbols for public displays and speech. Is the separation of church and state no longer part of our democracy? With a third flagpole essentially open to anyone, this should not have gone this far. It's that simple.
Source: WBUR - 🏆 274. / 63 Read more »